DA irate about Eskom’s bid for huge tariff hike as load-shedding is still a problem
Eskom says it needs ‘reasonable tariff increases’ to address financial sustainability and liquidity problems
19 July 2022 - 12:46
byUnathis Nkanjeni
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Electricity transmission pylons are shown in the Dunoon informal settlement in Cape Town. Picture: BLOOMBERG/DWAYNE SENIOR
The DA has rejected Eskom’s application to increase electricity tariffs 32.7%, saying South Africans cannot pay more to be kept in the dark.
The embattled state-owned power utility asked the National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) for a tariff increase, which would result in households paying more for electricity during ongoing load-shedding.
Eskom said it needed “reasonable tariff increases” to address financial sustainability and liquidity challenges.
“Liquidity and solvency risks pose an inordinate threat to Eskom’s ability to continue as a going concern. To improve liquidity, we have restricted organisational cash requirements through targeted savings.
“We had to rely on government support to maintain a positive cash balance, with increases in equity. Due to high debt servicing obligations, maintaining the liquidity buffer at acceptable levels continues to be a challenge,” said Eskom.
Nersa was ordered by the Pretoria high court to publish Eskom’s tariff application for 2023/2024 on or before August 1 and make a determination by December 24.
The DA said it would submit its objections to the proposed “rip-off” once Nersa opens public comments.
“South Africans are already struggling to stay above water due to rising costs of living and a high inflationary environment. For Eskom to add an additional high electricity tariff increase for a service it cannot provide is simply unacceptable,” said DA MP Kevin Mileham.
Mileham said consumers could not be expected to subsidise Eskom’s unviable business model and the ANC’s decades-long failure to open up the energy market to independent power producers.
“Instead of liberalising the energy market and allowing IPPs to bring new energy generation capacity online, [energy minister] Gwede Mantashe is busy wasting time on a fantasy about a ‘new Eskom entity to compete with Eskom’. Nersa should reject Eskom’s exorbitant tariff application because its first obligation is towards consumers, not Eskom,” he said.
Mantashe is reportedly in talks with President Cyril Ramaphosa over the establishment of a “second Eskom’’.
The additional state-owned utility would work alongside Eskom and apparently focus entirely on generating electricity and building more power stations.
Mantashe told the Sunday Times the country needs “baseload”, an apparent reference to burning coal.
“What we are suggesting — it’s not a decision yet — is let’s have a second generation company of the state and that company must focus on baseload and there must be a build programme for power stations,” he said.
“We can’t allow power stations to only hear decommission. We must also have a build programme and we think if Eskom has no capacity, let’s start a second generation company.”
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
DA irate about Eskom’s bid for huge tariff hike as load-shedding is still a problem
Eskom says it needs ‘reasonable tariff increases’ to address financial sustainability and liquidity problems
The DA has rejected Eskom’s application to increase electricity tariffs 32.7%, saying South Africans cannot pay more to be kept in the dark.
The embattled state-owned power utility asked the National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) for a tariff increase, which would result in households paying more for electricity during ongoing load-shedding.
Eskom said it needed “reasonable tariff increases” to address financial sustainability and liquidity challenges.
“Liquidity and solvency risks pose an inordinate threat to Eskom’s ability to continue as a going concern. To improve liquidity, we have restricted organisational cash requirements through targeted savings.
“We had to rely on government support to maintain a positive cash balance, with increases in equity. Due to high debt servicing obligations, maintaining the liquidity buffer at acceptable levels continues to be a challenge,” said Eskom.
Nersa was ordered by the Pretoria high court to publish Eskom’s tariff application for 2023/2024 on or before August 1 and make a determination by December 24.
The DA said it would submit its objections to the proposed “rip-off” once Nersa opens public comments.
“South Africans are already struggling to stay above water due to rising costs of living and a high inflationary environment. For Eskom to add an additional high electricity tariff increase for a service it cannot provide is simply unacceptable,” said DA MP Kevin Mileham.
Mileham said consumers could not be expected to subsidise Eskom’s unviable business model and the ANC’s decades-long failure to open up the energy market to independent power producers.
“Instead of liberalising the energy market and allowing IPPs to bring new energy generation capacity online, [energy minister] Gwede Mantashe is busy wasting time on a fantasy about a ‘new Eskom entity to compete with Eskom’. Nersa should reject Eskom’s exorbitant tariff application because its first obligation is towards consumers, not Eskom,” he said.
Mantashe is reportedly in talks with President Cyril Ramaphosa over the establishment of a “second Eskom’’.
The additional state-owned utility would work alongside Eskom and apparently focus entirely on generating electricity and building more power stations.
Mantashe told the Sunday Times the country needs “baseload”, an apparent reference to burning coal.
“What we are suggesting — it’s not a decision yet — is let’s have a second generation company of the state and that company must focus on baseload and there must be a build programme for power stations,” he said.
“We can’t allow power stations to only hear decommission. We must also have a build programme and we think if Eskom has no capacity, let’s start a second generation company.”
TimesLIVE
WATCH: Unpacking the feasibility of Eskom 2.0
STUART THEOBALD: Switching ideas on plans for Eskom 2.0
CARTOON: Behind Mantashe’s Eskom 2.0
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
TOM EATON: Last rounds, comrades, and a double Eskom on the rocks for me
HILARY JOFFE: Why an energy emergency and a ‘second Eskom’ should be ...
Alternative power supply is now key to business sustainability
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.