Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s case postponed after lawyer gets unnamed text message
Two independent sources have confirmed that the ‘unfortunate development’ was a text message sent to counsel for the speaker of parliament, Andrew Breitenbach
26 April 2022 - 16:11
by FRANNY RABKIN
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane. Picture: SUNDAY TIMES/THAPELO MOREBUDI
An anonymous text message to one of the lawyers was the cause of a last-minute postponement to the court case by public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane to interdict parliament’s impeachment process and her possible suspension, TimesLIVE has reliably learnt.
The hearing was supposed to run over Tuesday and Wednesday in the Western Cape High Court. After an hour’s wait, Mkhwebane’s counsel, Dali Mpofu, told the court the parties had agreed to postpone to “seek clarity” over “an unfortunate development” related to Mkhwebane’s application to the Constitutional Court to rescind, or reverse, its judgment that paved the way for parliament to proceed with an impeachment process against her.
Two independent sources have confirmed that the “unfortunate development” was a text message, sent to counsel for the speaker of parliament, Andrew Breitenbach. The message said the sender had it on good authority that the Constitutional Court would soon, within the week, be refusing to entertain Mkhwebane’s application to rescind its impeachment judgment.
Courts’ intended orders are normally confidential until the moment they are delivered. Breitenbach then disclosed the message to the Western Cape High Court judges and counsel for the other parties.
In response to a request for comment, Breitenbach said the bar’s ethical rules did not allow him to comment.
In March, Mkhwebane had applied to the Constitutional Court to rescind its February judgment on parliament’s impeachment rules, saying it contained patent errors. But the apex court is yet to give directions or judgment in the application.
In the meantime, Mkhwebane went to the high court in Cape Town asking for an interim interdict to prevent parliament from pressing ahead until the Constitutional Court decided. She also wants the high court to order that President Cyril Ramaphosa may not suspend her.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s case postponed after lawyer gets unnamed text message
Two independent sources have confirmed that the ‘unfortunate development’ was a text message sent to counsel for the speaker of parliament, Andrew Breitenbach
An anonymous text message to one of the lawyers was the cause of a last-minute postponement to the court case by public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane to interdict parliament’s impeachment process and her possible suspension, TimesLIVE has reliably learnt.
The hearing was supposed to run over Tuesday and Wednesday in the Western Cape High Court. After an hour’s wait, Mkhwebane’s counsel, Dali Mpofu, told the court the parties had agreed to postpone to “seek clarity” over “an unfortunate development” related to Mkhwebane’s application to the Constitutional Court to rescind, or reverse, its judgment that paved the way for parliament to proceed with an impeachment process against her.
Two independent sources have confirmed that the “unfortunate development” was a text message, sent to counsel for the speaker of parliament, Andrew Breitenbach. The message said the sender had it on good authority that the Constitutional Court would soon, within the week, be refusing to entertain Mkhwebane’s application to rescind its impeachment judgment.
Courts’ intended orders are normally confidential until the moment they are delivered. Breitenbach then disclosed the message to the Western Cape High Court judges and counsel for the other parties.
In response to a request for comment, Breitenbach said the bar’s ethical rules did not allow him to comment.
In March, Mkhwebane had applied to the Constitutional Court to rescind its February judgment on parliament’s impeachment rules, saying it contained patent errors. But the apex court is yet to give directions or judgment in the application.
In the meantime, Mkhwebane went to the high court in Cape Town asking for an interim interdict to prevent parliament from pressing ahead until the Constitutional Court decided. She also wants the high court to order that President Cyril Ramaphosa may not suspend her.
The case has been postponed until May 18 and 19.
TimesLIVE
Bantu Holomisa supports position of Busisiwe Mkhwebane
Parliamentary inquiry into Mkhwebane proceeds despite warning of interdict
DA slates Ramaphosa for allowing the public protector to stay in office for now
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
EDITORIAL: After Mkhwebane, how about the rest?
LETTER: Ramaphosa has the power to suspend the public protector
TOM EATON: No judge dread here after Mogoeng’s angels and red dragons
LETTER: Suspend Busisiwe Mkhwebane now, Mr President
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.