Decision by SCA about Jacob Zuma ‘glaringly vague’, foundation says
Jacob Zuma Foundation says Zuma’s legal team will approach the president of the Supreme Court of Appeal for clarity on the ruling
04 April 2022 - 13:51
byUnathi Nkanjeni
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Former president Jacob Zuma. Picture: SANDILE NDLOVU
The Jacob Zuma Foundation says the recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) is “disappointing but not unexpected”.
The appeals court dismissed former president Jacob Zuma’s leave to appeal against his corruption prosecution, which included his attempt to remove state advocate Billy Downer from the trial.
Zuma’s corruption trial is scheduled to start on April 11. He and French arms company Thales face several charges of corruption‚ racketeering‚ fraud and money-laundering linked to the multibillion-rand arms deal.
In a statement on Monday‚ the foundation said Zuma’s legal team would approach the president of the SCA for clarity on the ruling.
It said it was “astounded by the glaring vagueness and the ambiguity” of the decision.
“A blanket approach and routine order of dismissal do not provide the required clarity. Court judgments are there to provide legal certainty and clarity so subjective inferences are avoided. All litigants are entitled to know the exact and real reasons their cases are successful or not‚ and this is not the case here‚” the foundation said.
The group said Zuma had briefed his legal team to do all that was necessary to approach the president of the SCA‚ in line with the relevant legislation‚ to seek appropriate remedies including reconsideration‚ variation or clarification of the decision.
“All that Zuma wants is a fair trial‚ and will leave no stone unturned to ensure the constitutional promise of the rule of law and equality before the law is evenly applied to all‚” said the foundation.
“For the criminal trial to proceed under the present conditions while these legal protections are being pursued would be a travesty of justice and a vindictive assault on our constitution‚” it said.
Pietermaritzburg trial court judge Piet Koen dismissed Zuma’s “special plea” to remove Downer from his corruption case.
Zuma had entered the “special plea” in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act‚ challenging Downer’s “title to prosecute”.
Koen‚ however‚ ruled that any alleged infringement of his fair trial rights should be determined at the end of the criminal trial‚ and said Zuma’s prospects of appeal were poor.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Decision by SCA about Jacob Zuma ‘glaringly vague’, foundation says
Jacob Zuma Foundation says Zuma’s legal team will approach the president of the Supreme Court of Appeal for clarity on the ruling
The Jacob Zuma Foundation says the recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) is “disappointing but not unexpected”.
The appeals court dismissed former president Jacob Zuma’s leave to appeal against his corruption prosecution, which included his attempt to remove state advocate Billy Downer from the trial.
Zuma’s corruption trial is scheduled to start on April 11. He and French arms company Thales face several charges of corruption‚ racketeering‚ fraud and money-laundering linked to the multibillion-rand arms deal.
In a statement on Monday‚ the foundation said Zuma’s legal team would approach the president of the SCA for clarity on the ruling.
It said it was “astounded by the glaring vagueness and the ambiguity” of the decision.
“A blanket approach and routine order of dismissal do not provide the required clarity. Court judgments are there to provide legal certainty and clarity so subjective inferences are avoided. All litigants are entitled to know the exact and real reasons their cases are successful or not‚ and this is not the case here‚” the foundation said.
The group said Zuma had briefed his legal team to do all that was necessary to approach the president of the SCA‚ in line with the relevant legislation‚ to seek appropriate remedies including reconsideration‚ variation or clarification of the decision.
“All that Zuma wants is a fair trial‚ and will leave no stone unturned to ensure the constitutional promise of the rule of law and equality before the law is evenly applied to all‚” said the foundation.
“For the criminal trial to proceed under the present conditions while these legal protections are being pursued would be a travesty of justice and a vindictive assault on our constitution‚” it said.
Pietermaritzburg trial court judge Piet Koen dismissed Zuma’s “special plea” to remove Downer from his corruption case.
Zuma had entered the “special plea” in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act‚ challenging Downer’s “title to prosecute”.
Koen‚ however‚ ruled that any alleged infringement of his fair trial rights should be determined at the end of the criminal trial‚ and said Zuma’s prospects of appeal were poor.
TimesLIVE
‘It was a humiliation’, Ramaphosa says of failed insurrection in July 2021 which left him feeling betrayed
POLITICAL WEEK AHEAD: Zondo report expected to highlight Eskom’s capture
BUSISIWE MAVUSO: SA held hostage by corruption
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
No chance of appeal, SCA tells Zuma, which means corruption trial set for April ...
Factionalism still imperils ANC’s reign, Ramaphosa warns
PETER ATTARD MONTALTO: Zondo reports remind us of the pong and the value of ...
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.