SA pushes ahead with localisation policy
SA’s government is planning more measures to bolster its ailing building industry after banning the use of imported cement on state construction projects.
“Government is undertaking research across a range of construction-related products where there appears to be significant potential for localisation,” Stephen Hanival, chief economist at the department of trade, industry & competition, said in an emailed response to questions. “Further announcements will be made in due course.”
The country’s preferential procurement policy framework enables the department to designate sectors for localisation in line with national development and industrial policy goals. While the government has pursued localisation since 2014, it has become more strategic since the advent of the pandemic with business, the government and labour groups agreeing on an initial list of 42 products and subsectors that should be prioritised, Hanival said.
An October 11 directive issued by the Treasury that aims at ensuring locally produced cement is used for state projects sent shares in leading producer PPC to their highest level since 2019. It was the first of its kind since President Cyril Ramaphosa touted localisation in 2020 as a key strategy to revive an economy hard-hit by the coronavirus pandemic.
Localisation is seen as an approach to boost output, revive the domestic manufacturing industry and create jobs in an economy that contracted the most in at least 27 years in 2020 due to Covid-19 restrictions and where more than a third of the workforce is unemployed. Manufacturing’s contribution to GDP declined to 11.8% in 2020, from 19.2% in 1994, when the ANC came to power, World Bank data shows.
SA spends about a quarter of its national wealth on buying foreign goods every year and has an “over-propensity” to import products that could otherwise be domestically produced, the trade department said in May. The nation’s recovery plan also targets local production of a range of other products, including consumer and capital goods, and car and rail components.
“Such policies would benefit small companies that have not only been hard hit by the pandemic, but also need customers such as government to sustain them,” said Thabi Leoka, an independent economist. “If localisation involves large monopolies being given government contracts, then it’s misplaced.”
The localisation drive will run alongside six so-called Master Plans aimed at supporting the domestic poultry, sugar, automobile, furniture, steel and metal fabrication, and clothing, textile, footwear and leather sectors. Together, the industries account for about 6% of GDP and 700,000 jobs, according to the department.
Localisation is not a panacea and may have “adverse economic consequences by creating monopolies, reducing competition, increasing the costs of doing business and weakening incentives for productivity and innovation”, said Peter Leon, a partner and Africa co-chair at law firm Herbert Smith Freehills. Policies that create barriers to cross-border flows of goods and services could contravene SA’s international trade obligations and result in its commercial partners seeking recourse, he said.
Bloomberg News. For more articles like this please visit Bloomberg.com.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.