We've got news for you.

Register on BusinessLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now
Western Cape judge president John Hlophe. Picture: GALLO IMAGES/FOTO24/NELIUS RADEMAN
Western Cape judge president John Hlophe. Picture: GALLO IMAGES/FOTO24/NELIUS RADEMAN

Western Cape judge president John Hlophe has urgently gone to court for an interdict to stay parliament's impending impeachment process against him and the process for his suspension by President Cyril Ramaphosa.

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) in August decided by a majority that Hlophe was guilty of gross misconduct for a 2008 complaint by all the then justices of the Constitutional Court. The apex court justices complained that he had sought to influence the outcome of cases, then pending before their court, related to corruption charges against former president Jacob Zuma.

The JSC’s decision was then sent to parliament, which must still  decide whether to impeach, in line with the constitution.

Hlophe will also ask the Johannesburg high court — in the second part of his application — to declare that the August 25 meeting at which his guilt was decided — was unlawful because the JSC was not properly constituted. This was, he argues, because neither the chief justice nor deputy chief justice were there, as required by the constitution.

Constitutional Court justice Sisi Khampepe “was neither the chief justice nor a deputy chief justice at the taking of the JSC decision on 25 August”, he said.

Hlophe said that in addition neither the president nor deputy president of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) were there, and an attorney to represent the attorneys’ profession, in line with the constitution, was also absent.

The judge president also asked the court for a declaration that Khampepe, SCA justice Boissie Mbha, Gauteng judge president Dunstan Mlambo and Western Cape premier Alan Winde were “automatically disqualified” from participating in the JSC meeting.

He said these people “suffer from various degrees of conflict, or are people against whom I have a reasonable apprehension of bias”. The judges mentioned were all part of panels that made decisions in some of the many court cases over the 2008 complaint, he said.

Hlophe added that Mlambo was “involved and actively participated” in his removal from the JSC as a representative of the judges president.

“The tradition has always been to have the most senior judge president represent the heads of court … I was the most senior judge president who succeeded judge president Ngoepe. My removal from the JSC was masterminded and instigated by judge president Mlambo and other judges,” he said.

The reason for their actions was that his removal was justified by the complaint against him, said Hlophe.

Hlophe said Winde “adopted inexplicable animosity towards me”. He said he could only explain this on the basis that Winde was a “staunch and committed” member of the DA.

Hlophe also asked the Johannesburg high court to set aside the decision of the Judicial Conduct Tribunal, on which the majority of the JSC based its decision. He has also asked the court to set aside the majority’s decision on the basis that it violated his right to equality before the law “and the right to an adjudication by an impartial tribunal”.