NEWS ANALYSIS: Zondo commission — who were the captors of the state captors?
This question lies at the heart of the deputy chief justice’s attempt to determine who should have done what to prevent state capture
There is a question deputy chief justice Raymond Zondo keeps asking: who should have done what to prevent state capture? It is not listed in the terms of reference of the state capture inquiry, but Zondo often puts it to witnesses appearing before him and also mentioned it in a television interview this week. It is obviously top of mind and reflects the judge’s thinking about the anatomy of state capture. The voters entrusted the running of the government to a political party and the party then deployed people into leadership positions. Zondo is obviously trying to identify how people not linked to the governing party or the state were able to take control. Was it oversight, negligence, failure or wilful surrender? If so, who should be held accountable? This might be one of the most significant outcomes of the commission. In order to make this finding, Zondo needs more pieces of the puzzle. Through the evidence presented at the commission, it is still not clear how the Guptas were a...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.