President Jacob Zuma made yet another major admission in court on Tuesday, conceding that the R17m golden handshake offered to former National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) boss Mxolisi Nxasana was unlawful. Zuma’s lawyer, Ishmael Semenya, said that the payment to the former national director of public prosecutions was unlawful and that Nxasana should pay back the money. Zuma has made similar about-turns in court recently. He conceded in the Supreme Court of Appeals in Bloemfontein that the decision to drop corruption charges against him in 2009 had been irrational. This was after a protracted legal battle. This was also after he told the Constitutional Court that he would pay back the money for the Nkandla "security upgrades" — this too came about after a protracted legal battle. Zuma’s latest climbdown has created another legal headache. If Nxasana’s resignation was unlawful, what should happen to the current leadership of the NPA? The court has given the applicants, the respondents...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.