Most people who work in the cultural sector — artists, administrators, promoters and entrepreneurs — see policy documents as the place where creativity goes to die. Prospective readers are scared off by the language and the length; the introductory statements (never mind the numbered subsections that follow) seem already to reek of bureaucracy and legal or procedural technicalities.

Yet such policies shape the arts landscape, directly influencing the conditions under which artists work. Their ideological framing is either explicitly or implicitly presented. They inform budgetary allocation. They can create, dismantle or reconfigure cultural institutions. Engaging with them helps the reader to identify potential opportunities and constraints. And they can be used to hold the powerful to account.

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as exclusive Financial Times articles, ProfileData financial data, and digital access to the Sunday Times and Times Select.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems? Email or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now