Scientists optimistic about finding a cure for HIV
Various strategies are beginning to show some promise, with some partial successes reported
02 December 2024 - 05:00
byThumbi Ndung’u
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
People gather around candles in the shape of a ribbon during an HIV/AIDS awareness campaign. Picture: REUTERS
With the help ofnew scientificandtechnological developments, the HIV/Aids research community is increasingly turning to an ambitious goal: finding a cure for HIV/Aids.
If the world is to get close to meeting theUN Sustainable Development Goalof reducing HIV infections and Aids-related deaths by 90% between 2010 and 2030, a cure for HIV/Aids would be a game changer.
Much progress has been made during the 30 years in the fight against HIV/Aids. An HIV diagnosis is no longer the death sentence it was in the 1990s.
Antiretroviral treatment (ART) — which targets and suppresses the replication of the virus within the body — means people living with HIV are ableto live long, fulfilling lives,without the risk of spreadingthe HIV virus to others.
However, even with ART, living with HIVincreases the riskof other serious health issues. All of this is ends up putting an economic burden on states,through increased healthcare spendingand losses in workplace productivity.
SA is a good example of a country that would benefit from the discovery of a cure. SA has been providingfree antiretrovirals through the public healthcare system since 2004. It is the largest factor behind the50% dropin the number of new HIV infections in SA from 2010 to 2021.
But the programme is expensive. In 2023, SA’stotal budget for HIV responsewas R30bn. This amount includes funding from international sources, such asthe US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar). Consider that the country’s total national healthcare budget for 2022/23 wasabout R64.5bn.
Also, we never know when the external funding, or part of it, might dry up. Funding for HIV/Aids response isheavily dependent on political will and leadership. Recent political developments in high income countries, such as the US presidential election, would suggest a reluctance and even opposition towards pumping funds into healthcare beyond their own borders, and especially in Africa.
I work in HIV prevention and cure research.My work focusesspecifically on understanding interactions between HIV and the immune system and how these may be harnessed and translated for HIV prevention or cure.
There is hope and optimism that HIV can be cured, with various strategies beginning to show some promise, with partial successes reported.
Finding a cure
Cure research is in its infancy, but there are excitinghints that gene therapy andimmunotherapiesmight lead us to a cure.
So far, there have beenseven people worldwide cured of HIV. They were living with HIV who developed cancer, and were treated for the cancer through bone marrow transplantation, a form of gene therapy, and this also led to the elimination of HIV because the bone marrow transplants were from donors lacking HIV coreceptors — proteins on cell surfaces that viruses use to bind and enter cells.
But a bone-marrow transplant is aradical, expensiveandoften dangerous procedure. There is no way we can view it as an avenue for developing a cure when there is reliable ART on hand. In contrast, some strategies involving a combination of early treatment and immunotherapyare also showing some promise and these could be developed further for long-term control of HIV without antiretroviral therapy.
While curing a viral infection is difficult, medical science is already able to eradicate some viral infections, such ashepatitis C. Others, such as the common cold andCovid-19, are effectively eliminated by a well-functioning immune system.
The challenge with HIV is that itlocks into an individual’s DNA, making it particularly difficult to get rid of. It alsomutates a lot, which is why it is so difficult to develop a vaccine against it.
That has led us to explore whysome people appear able to neutralise HIVwhen not taking ART but on one-off or temporary therapy that boosts their immune system. This seems to happen in some people who are diagnosed with HIV early in their infection and immediately go on ART, and then interrupt the treatment but simultaneously take the special immune-boosting treatments with antiviral properties.
So far, the HIV research community is unable to predict who will react in this way, but the Africa Health Research Institute and the HIV Pathogenesis Programme, within the University of KwaZulu-Natal,are conducting researchamong a group of young women from a community in KwaZulu-Natal, with a high HIV infection rate.
These young women areinvited to participatein a socioeconomic empowerment programme that has them attend a clinic twice weekly for training in basic computer skills, HIV prevention and other life skills.
At each attendance, each woman is tested for HIV. If one is found to have acquired HIV, she is immediately given a standard course of ART. After a while, immune-boosting therapies that include broadly neutralising antibodies are added, and then the woman is asked to stop ART treatment under strict monitoring to establish whether she is able to control the virus on her own. If not, she is immediately returned to ART.Of more than2,500 attendees since the study began a decade ago, 108 have become HIV-positive. Of these 108 living with HIV, 20 are participating in the cure clinical trial.
The study is ongoing, and our hope is that this strategy will lead to long-term control of the virus in the absence of ART in some of the women. This can then help us to better understand the immune mechanisms that may control the virus without antiretroviral therapy, and this could lead to a cure.
Much work still needs to be done but finding a cure is important, especially forthe 40-million peopleacross the world living with HIV.
The worldis not on trackto meet the UN goal of ending the HIV/Aids pandemic by 2030. While the rate of HIV infection has dropped remarkably, it is still much higher than the targets the global healthcare community has set itself. For example, in 2023 there were1.3-million new HIV infections worldwideagainst a target of 500,000to achieve the aim of nearly eradicating HIV by 2030.
It is vital that HIV/Aids research continues in Africa because, whilethe incidence of HIV infection is reducing markedly, this status quo could change at any time and we could be back fighting a pandemic. It would be good to do so with better tools.
Also, we must find a cure or vaccine that is tailored to Africa,where HIV is a young woman’s disease, while also seeking the same for the regions whereHIV infection is rising— Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe.
We’re playing a long game, but there is definitely hope, and that is definitely something to celebrate.
• Ndung’u is the director for basic and translational science at the Africa Health Research Institute
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Scientists optimistic about finding a cure for HIV
Various strategies are beginning to show some promise, with some partial successes reported
With the help of new scientific and technological developments, the HIV/Aids research community is increasingly turning to an ambitious goal: finding a cure for HIV/Aids.
If the world is to get close to meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goal of reducing HIV infections and Aids-related deaths by 90% between 2010 and 2030, a cure for HIV/Aids would be a game changer.
Much progress has been made during the 30 years in the fight against HIV/Aids. An HIV diagnosis is no longer the death sentence it was in the 1990s.
Antiretroviral treatment (ART) — which targets and suppresses the replication of the virus within the body — means people living with HIV are able to live long, fulfilling lives, without the risk of spreading the HIV virus to others.
However, even with ART, living with HIV increases the risk of other serious health issues. All of this is ends up putting an economic burden on states, through increased healthcare spending and losses in workplace productivity.
SA is a good example of a country that would benefit from the discovery of a cure. SA has been providing free antiretrovirals through the public healthcare system since 2004. It is the largest factor behind the 50% drop in the number of new HIV infections in SA from 2010 to 2021.
But the programme is expensive. In 2023, SA’s total budget for HIV response was R30bn. This amount includes funding from international sources, such as the US President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar). Consider that the country’s total national healthcare budget for 2022/23 was about R64.5bn.
Also, we never know when the external funding, or part of it, might dry up. Funding for HIV/Aids response is heavily dependent on political will and leadership. Recent political developments in high income countries, such as the US presidential election, would suggest a reluctance and even opposition towards pumping funds into healthcare beyond their own borders, and especially in Africa.
I work in HIV prevention and cure research. My work focuses specifically on understanding interactions between HIV and the immune system and how these may be harnessed and translated for HIV prevention or cure.
There is hope and optimism that HIV can be cured, with various strategies beginning to show some promise, with partial successes reported.
Finding a cure
Cure research is in its infancy, but there are exciting hints that gene therapy and immunotherapies might lead us to a cure.
So far, there have been seven people worldwide cured of HIV. They were living with HIV who developed cancer, and were treated for the cancer through bone marrow transplantation, a form of gene therapy, and this also led to the elimination of HIV because the bone marrow transplants were from donors lacking HIV coreceptors — proteins on cell surfaces that viruses use to bind and enter cells.
But a bone-marrow transplant is a radical, expensive and often dangerous procedure. There is no way we can view it as an avenue for developing a cure when there is reliable ART on hand. In contrast, some strategies involving a combination of early treatment and immunotherapy are also showing some promise and these could be developed further for long-term control of HIV without antiretroviral therapy.
While curing a viral infection is difficult, medical science is already able to eradicate some viral infections, such as hepatitis C. Others, such as the common cold and Covid-19, are effectively eliminated by a well-functioning immune system.
The challenge with HIV is that it locks into an individual’s DNA, making it particularly difficult to get rid of. It also mutates a lot, which is why it is so difficult to develop a vaccine against it.
That has led us to explore why some people appear able to neutralise HIV when not taking ART but on one-off or temporary therapy that boosts their immune system. This seems to happen in some people who are diagnosed with HIV early in their infection and immediately go on ART, and then interrupt the treatment but simultaneously take the special immune-boosting treatments with antiviral properties.
So far, the HIV research community is unable to predict who will react in this way, but the Africa Health Research Institute and the HIV Pathogenesis Programme, within the University of KwaZulu-Natal, are conducting research among a group of young women from a community in KwaZulu-Natal, with a high HIV infection rate.
These young women are invited to participate in a socioeconomic empowerment programme that has them attend a clinic twice weekly for training in basic computer skills, HIV prevention and other life skills.
At each attendance, each woman is tested for HIV. If one is found to have acquired HIV, she is immediately given a standard course of ART. After a while, immune-boosting therapies that include broadly neutralising antibodies are added, and then the woman is asked to stop ART treatment under strict monitoring to establish whether she is able to control the virus on her own. If not, she is immediately returned to ART. Of more than 2,500 attendees since the study began a decade ago, 108 have become HIV-positive. Of these 108 living with HIV, 20 are participating in the cure clinical trial.
The study is ongoing, and our hope is that this strategy will lead to long-term control of the virus in the absence of ART in some of the women. This can then help us to better understand the immune mechanisms that may control the virus without antiretroviral therapy, and this could lead to a cure.
Much work still needs to be done but finding a cure is important, especially for the 40-million people across the world living with HIV.
The world is not on track to meet the UN goal of ending the HIV/Aids pandemic by 2030. While the rate of HIV infection has dropped remarkably, it is still much higher than the targets the global healthcare community has set itself. For example, in 2023 there were 1.3-million new HIV infections worldwide against a target of 500,000 to achieve the aim of nearly eradicating HIV by 2030.
It is vital that HIV/Aids research continues in Africa because, while the incidence of HIV infection is reducing markedly, this status quo could change at any time and we could be back fighting a pandemic. It would be good to do so with better tools.
Also, we must find a cure or vaccine that is tailored to Africa, where HIV is a young woman’s disease, while also seeking the same for the regions where HIV infection is rising — Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe.
We’re playing a long game, but there is definitely hope, and that is definitely something to celebrate.
• Ndung’u is the director for basic and translational science at the Africa Health Research Institute
This article appeared first on The Conversation
ROBERT D NEWMAN: Why we need to treat other chronic diseases alongside HIV/Aids
EDITORIAL: State correct on ARVs for zama-zamas
Will rich nations share their mpox shots with Africa?
HIV prevalence at 32.2% among Gauteng residents aged 50-54
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Can South Africa afford to not have climate-friendly ARVs?
Why the Competition Commission’s decision on two cancer drug cases could have ...
Where are we in the search for an HIV cure?
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.