Emerging markets’ bond-buying experiment paid off, but for how long?
Quantitative easing was adopted by more than a dozen EMs, including SA, seeking to combat economic pain from the pandemic
London — Many emerging markets (EM) emulated their developed peers this year with bond-buying programmes that successfully tamped down borrowing costs, yet unease is also stirring about the possible hit to hard-won monetary policy independence.
Quantitative easing (QE), until recently the preserve of advanced economies such as Japan or the US, was adopted this year by more than a dozen emerging markets seeking to combat economic pain from the Covid-19 pandemic.
While some central banks, including the SA Reserve Bank and that of India, limited themselves to buying government debt in secondary trading, others, such as Indonesia and Ghana, launched themselves straight into primary markets, snapping up bonds as soon as they were issued.
EM watchers, such as David Hauner at Bank of America (BOA), are broadly positive on the results.
“So far it has been a success in a sense that it has actually reduced borrowing costs in the local currency for many EMs, reduced illiquidity in bad times, and helped cap yields as well,” Hauner said.
The coronavirus-led market rout hit developing economies hard, with more than $100bn fleeing equity and bond markets, while currencies, such as Indonesia’s rupiah and the rand, tumbled by between 15% and 21% in the first quarter.
Lately, both have recouped losses, standing about 4% down on the year.
Hauner, however, warns of the longer-term risk that governments get used to central banks underwriting their debt with bond-buying schemes.
“At some point this reduces the incentive to tackle fiscal deficits ... basically, monetary policy gets subordinated under fiscal policy needs, which is the old problem that EMs used to have before they introduced independent central banks and inflation targeting.”
The issue is debated extensively in the developed world too, but freedom to set monetary policy, free of political interference, may be especially vital in EMs, given a history of inflation and their need to lure foreign capital.
The concern is biggest for economies that have traditionally struggled with balance of payment deficits such as SA and Indonesia, but which also face rising debt levels. EM debt-to-GDP hit nearly 250% in the July-September period.
Many emerging central banks also launched into QE while they still had room to cut interest rates — unlike in most of the developed world. For instance, Ghanaian and Turkish rates are about 15%, while rates in SA, India and Malaysia were above 6% when bond buying kicked off.
Yet, while QE in most developed countries brought down borrowing costs and flattened the yield curve, the same did not always happen in EMs.
François Savary, chief investment officer at Swiss wealth manager Prime Partners, said this shows markets took into account macroeconomic conditions in countries that were traditionally much less stable.
“Even if you have QE, people are still reluctant to consider that the long-term risks do not exist, so there is still a premium for the uncertainties and sustainability of the fundamentals in the medium to the long term,” he said.
Still, in a world of ultra-low interest rates, the pull of EMs is huge, and capital inflows have rebounded in recent months, hitting record highs in November. The world’s biggest asset manager BlackRock predicts healthy gains in 2021 for the sector.
Investors appear “little bothered so far” by asset-buying programmes in countries such as India, Indonesia and the Philippines, S&P Global Ratings’s Andrew Wood noted. But he also warned the lure of high yields might wear off.
“The relatively mild market impact of central bank purchases of government bonds in these countries could change if the institutions increased their purchases, or if investors no longer saw the buying as temporary,” Wood said.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also recently warned that large-scale, open-ended asset buying risks eroding institutional credibility and pressuring capital flows.
“These risks need to be weighed before central banks embark on a shift in their policies and their implementation,” Dimitris Drakopoulos, a financial sector expert at the IMF, said in a note.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.