Picture: REUTERS
Picture: REUTERS

San Francisco — What is the true cost of an Uber ride? That simple question is often lost among the many controversies facing the ride-services company as it tries to hire a new CEO and resolve a bitter dispute with the old one, Travis Kalanick.

But it may be the most important question of all when it comes to determining the value of Uber, which has built its business on massive subsidies to both riders and drivers, producing huge losses in the process, and it has yet to show that it can maintain growth without them.

Uber will report second-quarter financials to investors this week, which will offer fresh insight on whether the company can get profitable any time soon.

Although private, Uber has started releasing limited quarterly financial data, and in May reported a loss of $708m for the first quarter, down from $991m in the fourth quarter of 2016. The upcoming financial report will show further improvement on margins, according to an Uber executive, but the company continues to spend heavily on subsidised rides in certain markets.

The issue of Uber’s valuation is hardly academic amid a boardroom battle over control of the company. Early backer Benchmark Capital has sued former CEO Kalanick and fought with other investors, some of whom have offered to buy Benchmark out.

The question vexing everyone is what the company is worth.

Benchmark, in a series of Tweets earlier in August, indicated that it believed Uber would soon be worth more than $100bn. Outside investors contemplating buying Uber shares, however, have indicated they think the company is worth less than its current $68bn valuation — perhaps much less.

Other investors are already discounting company shares. Four mutual fund companies holding Uber investments recently marked down their shares by as much as 15%, according to the latest disclosure documents released.

Reckoning soon? Uber’s losses stem from its drive to win global market share at almost any cost. That strategy was built on the assumption that Uber could achieve a dominant position in many big cities quickly and eventually raise prices. Kalanick himself said low fares were temporary.

But eight years in, the strategy is now in doubt as competition in many markets continues to intensify. Uber must solve the problem of how to eliminate subsidies without losing customers and thereby undercutting its valuation.

"There is going to come a reckoning and they are going to have to raise prices," said Brent Goldfarb, associate professor of management and entrepreneurship at the University of Maryland. "But we know what happens when you raise prices — demand goes down, and perhaps substantially so." Uber has raised about $15bn in funding since 2010, enabling it to discount fares and dole out bonuses to drivers that have at times exceeded $1,000.

In 2015, Uber passengers were paying only 41% of the actual cost of their trips, according to an analysis by transportation industry consultant Hubert Horan, based on financial statements from Uber.

Big discounts continue even in Uber’s most mature market, its home city of San Francisco, where as recently as June it was offering some passengers 50% off their next 10 rides and $3 carpool rides, a cheaper rate than two years ago.

"I’ve gone crosstown in San Francisco for $12," Goldfarb said. "There is no way that makes economic sense." False signal The Uber executive who spoke to Reuters pointed to a new "upfront" fare system that gives passengers a quote before their ride starts, as one of Uber’s key strategies to solving its pricing problem. In effect, it provides Uber a way to charge more without explicit per-mile fare increases.

The new system also uses an algorithm to better price rides to minimise losses. Someone requesting Uber’s carpool service on a route where there are unlikely to be other passengers to share the ride, for instance, will be quoted a higher price so the company does not have to eat the cost, said the executive, who asked not to be named.

The executive added that in the last year or so, Uber has reduced its blanket subsidies and become better at targeting its promotions to both riders and drivers.

In ride-hailing, subsidies are necessary when first launching a new city, investors argue. A company needs lots of drivers and passengers to create a marketplace that works, and offering bonuses and discounts is the best way to recruit them.

But subsidies can create an artificial signal about the size of the market: many customers might be using the service only because it is cheap or free.

Once subsidies are turned off, "how do you know where the bottom is?" asked Bejul Somaia, a partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners, which is not among Uber’s backers.

Uber already knows that higher prices scare off customers. A 2016 study by economists and Uber data experts found that when Uber alerted passengers that fares had doubled — part of Uber’s older "surge pricing" scheme — ride purchases immediately fell by about 40%.

The Uber executive argued that higher fares would have only a minimal effect on ride volume.

Indeed, data from the New York taxi business suggest a modest effect in the US. Industry research shows that, historically, when cabs raised fares by 20%, they lost 4% to 5% of their customers, said Bruce Schaller, a transportation consultant and former deputy commissioner at the New York City Department of Transportation.

"They have room to raise prices," Schaller said, speaking of Uber. "There is no question to me as to whether this can be a profitable business." But unexpectedly tough competitive pressure from Lyft, Uber’s chief rival in the US, has hindered Uber’s efforts to become profitable. Uber has steadily lost US market share to Lyft since last October, and now has 78% of the market, down from 85% in September, according to consumer spending data firm Earnest Research.

Subsidies have been especially debilitating to Uber in markets in Asia and the Middle East, where it is up against popular, well-funded local ride-service companies such as Ola, Grab and Careem.

In India, a price war with Ola pushed prices down as low as 8c/km — even the Uber executive said prices there are too cheap. But there’s little sign the company is turning a corner in the subsidies war. When Uber ended expensive driver incentives in the country, drivers went on strike, crippling the service.

The region has sucked billions from Uber’s coffers, raising the prospect that it could be forced to sell to local partners and abandon some countries, as it recently did in China and Russia.

Reuters

Please sign in or register to comment.