The Department of Mineral Resources remains steadfast in its belief that mining companies have to maintain their black ownership levels, even if it means being tied into long-life projects, and the onus is on mining right holders to ensure they retain empowerment levels. In the first of two court battles between the department and the Chamber of Mines, the parties argued the merits of their cases in seeking a declaratory order around whether mining companies could count on historical empowerment deals that were no longer in place or whether the department’s view of the first two Mining Charters held sway that companies had to perpetually top up their black ownership structures to at least 26% ownership. The day was dominated by the chamber’s senior counsel, Chris Loxton, who argued that there were no provisions in the act for perpetual top-ups of empowerment deals to maintain the 26% ownership level and that the second charter sought to apply conditions retrospectively on agreements...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.