Picture: SUPPLIED
Picture: SUPPLIED

Executives from Sibanye Gold, SA’s biggest gold miner, were in Los Angeles in the final stages of a roadshow with US bond fund managers last month when a bombshell hit from back home.

The government had introduced shock new rules requiring local mines be 30% black-owned in perpetuity, toughening existing requirements and implying hefty dilution for shareholders. South African stocks tumbled and bond yields rose that day. The measures, called Mining Charter 3, put at risk funding for Sibanye’s $2.2bn acquisition of Stillwater Mining Company of the US, the biggest foreign takeover by a South African mining company in 16 years.

"We had to hold back the financing, find out what the charter meant, and rebrief all our potential investors," CEO Neal Froneman said by phone. "A number of institutional investors pulled out of the bond process saying the risks in SA were just too high and it’s becoming uninvestable."

Companies and investors say the new rules and uncertainty will starve the industry of much-needed capital, shortening mine lives, reducing profits and adding to existing challenges of declining reserves and increasing costs. Most mining companies already offloaded 26% stakes and even entire mines to black investors at preferential rates in the 2000s to comply with previous rules, believing it was a one-time deal.

President Jacob Zuma backed the charter in parliament last month as part of his "radical economic transformation" agenda, intended to boost black participation in an economy that’s still one of the most unequal in the world, 23 years after the end of Apartheid rule.

But members of the ANC, including Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa, have signaled their doubts, saying the government and industry should go back to the drawing board and reach a negotiated settlement.

Mining companies have already begun fighting the charter through the courts and say the uncertainty will scare off investors. The first lawsuit, to block the charter while it winds through the legal process, has an initial hearing on July 18.

"We’re not going to accept it," Froneman said. "It’s unconstitutional to abuse shareholders retrospectively."

The legal cases "could potentially take three years to conclude," said Victor von Reiche, an analyst at Citadel Wealth Management in Cape Town. "In the meantime the mining industry in SA will suffer most, as investors will take a wait-and-see approach."

Mining companies have already begun fighting the charter through the courts and say the uncertainty will scare off investors

The charter imposes numerous extra levies on mining, the country’s biggest export industry, at a time when the economy is in recession and suffering from 28% unemployment. It also directs payments that the industry estimates could amount to R3.5bn into a government-controlled fund that will also manage communities’ stakes in mines.

Sibanye managed to complete the bond sale, but at a cost. It’s paying coupons of 6.125% and 7.125% on two bonds worth $1.05bn, 50 basis points higher than if the government had not published the charter, according to Froneman. The extra interest is worth $5.3m a year.

"This is bad news for mining, which was already shrinking due to the commodities cycle," said Dave Mohr, who helps oversee R110bn as chief strategist at Cape Town-based Old Mutual Multi-Managers. "It’s going to scare off investment while they go through the courts."

The Chamber of Mines, which represents mining companies, has taken the government to court to block the charter and argues that it’s in breach of company law, international agreements and the Constitution.

The most controversial of the new rules is around ownership. The charter says mining companies must "top up" to 30% within the next 12 months. But firms say it’s unclear whether they must increase from 26% or the current direct black ownership level.

 

Making sense

"We are struggling as everybody else to try and make sense of this charter," said Andile Sangqu, speaking in his position as vice-president of the Chamber of Mines. "That’s why we’ve opted to go to court." Sangqu is also the executive head of Anglo American’s South African operations.

Mining Minister Mosebenzi Zwane defends the new rules, saying they are necessary to resolve the inequities of Apartheid. As the world’s biggest gold producer for more than a century, SA’s mining industry was a key beneficiary of white minority rule, which ensured cheap labour and few environmental regulations.

More than two decades after that ended, average earnings for black households are a sixth of those of their white counterparts, according to Statistics SA.

"Anybody who does not want to see black people empowered, anybody who still wants to see black people treated like slaves, raise up their hands and say they are not part of the progressive SA," Zwane told reporters on June 23, referring to the charter’s critics.

The regulations’ timing couldn’t be worse. The economy unexpectedly tipped into a recession in the first quarter, and business confidence reached a more than three-decade low in September, amid political uncertainty. Though the June reading improved, the new mine rules pared its gain.

Anybody who does not want to see black people empowered, anybody who still wants to see black people treated like slaves, raise up their hands and say they are not part of the progressive SA
Zwane told reporters referring to the charter’s critics

While SA’s mining industry is a shadow of its former self — it peaked in the 1970s — it still represents 21% of exports and employs 457,000 people, about 7% of total employment. Many mineworkers migrate from rural areas and have as many as 10 dependents.

Investors aren’t waiting for the court decision to make a call on South African mining securities. About $3bn was wiped off Joburg-listed mining companies’ market value on June 15, when the charter was announced, although a US rate rise the previous evening also hit commodities stocks globally.

South African mining stocks have traded at a price to book discount for the last five years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

If the charter is implemented, shareholders are likely to push back on providing more equity to fund additional black empowerment deals, according to Douglas Rowlings, a Dubai-based analyst for Moody’s Investors Service. That means mining companies would be forced to use existing cash reserves or borrow money.

"That’s a credit negative from our point of view," Rowlings said. "The market response was hugely negative and contrary to the ANC’s policy of fostering inward investment into SA. The effect of the mining charter is totally opposite to that and would result in job losses."

Bloomberg

Please sign in or register to comment.