Birkenstocks do not deserve copyright protection, German court rules
Sandals qualify as design rather than art so are not covered by copyright, says Germany’s Federal Court of Justice
20 February 2025 - 14:48
byUrsula Knapp
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Karlsruhe — Birkenstock sandals, which have evolved from a symbol of counterculture to a trendy fashion item, do not qualify as art and are therefore not protected by copyright, Germany’s highest civil court ruled on Thursday.
The Federal Court of Justice dismissed a lawsuit brought by the German company, which had sought to prevent competitors, such as Germany’s Tchibo, from selling similar models.
“The claims are unfounded because they [the sandals] are not copyright-protected works of applied art,” presiding judge Thomas Koch said.
Under German law, copyright protection is valid for 70 years after the creator’s death, while design protection hinges on the product’s lifespan and ends after 25 years.
The legal distinction between design and art in German law lies in a product’s purpose. Design serves a practical function while works of applied art require a discernible level of individual artistic creativity.
Shoemaker and Birkenstock dynasty member Karl Birkenstock, born in 1936, is alive. However, since he crafted his initial designs in the 1970s, some sandals no longer enjoy design protection.
As a result, lawyers asked the court to classify the shoes as art.
Konstantin Wegner, Birkenstock’s lawyer, said the sandals had an “iconic design” and announced further litigation after the decision was announced. “We want to add arguments in these pending proceedings,” said Wegner without elaborating.
Once popular with hippies, tech enthusiasts and medical professionals, Birkenstock gained widespread attention after Australian actress Margot Robbie wore a pair of pink Birkenstocks in the final scene of the 2023 hit movie Barbie.
Founded in 1774, Birkenstock was run by the namesake family for six generations until it sold a majority stake to L Catterton, a US private equity firm backed by French billionaire Bernard Arnault and his luxury goods empire LVMH .
L Catterton remained Birkenstock’s biggest shareholder after the company went public in 2023.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Birkenstocks do not deserve copyright protection, German court rules
Sandals qualify as design rather than art so are not covered by copyright, says Germany’s Federal Court of Justice
Karlsruhe — Birkenstock sandals, which have evolved from a symbol of counterculture to a trendy fashion item, do not qualify as art and are therefore not protected by copyright, Germany’s highest civil court ruled on Thursday.
The Federal Court of Justice dismissed a lawsuit brought by the German company, which had sought to prevent competitors, such as Germany’s Tchibo, from selling similar models.
“The claims are unfounded because they [the sandals] are not copyright-protected works of applied art,” presiding judge Thomas Koch said.
Under German law, copyright protection is valid for 70 years after the creator’s death, while design protection hinges on the product’s lifespan and ends after 25 years.
The legal distinction between design and art in German law lies in a product’s purpose. Design serves a practical function while works of applied art require a discernible level of individual artistic creativity.
Shoemaker and Birkenstock dynasty member Karl Birkenstock, born in 1936, is alive. However, since he crafted his initial designs in the 1970s, some sandals no longer enjoy design protection.
As a result, lawyers asked the court to classify the shoes as art.
Konstantin Wegner, Birkenstock’s lawyer, said the sandals had an “iconic design” and announced further litigation after the decision was announced. “We want to add arguments in these pending proceedings,” said Wegner without elaborating.
Once popular with hippies, tech enthusiasts and medical professionals, Birkenstock gained widespread attention after Australian actress Margot Robbie wore a pair of pink Birkenstocks in the final scene of the 2023 hit movie Barbie.
Founded in 1774, Birkenstock was run by the namesake family for six generations until it sold a majority stake to L Catterton, a US private equity firm backed by French billionaire Bernard Arnault and his luxury goods empire LVMH .
L Catterton remained Birkenstock’s biggest shareholder after the company went public in 2023.
Reuters
Norway ethics watchdog sets sights on shoemakers and crypto firms
Truworths signals mixed full-year performance
Truworths looks to the UK for growth
Birkenstock sees lower margins as it expands global footprint
Birkenstock stock strides to top rating by Wall Street
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.