The Supreme Court of Appeal incorrectly interpreted the Medical Schemes Act when it concluded that funds in a personal medical savings account could not be treated as both an asset and trust property of a member, Genesis Medical Scheme’s adv Schalk Burger said on Tuesday. Lawyers for Genesis Medical Scheme and the Council for Medical Schemes battled it out at the Constitutional Court on Tuesday over what should happen to the personal medical savings accounts of members if the scheme went insolvent. The case’s outcome will affect how the medical scheme presents financial information in future and will have a ripple effect on all schemes with a similar savings plan. In 2016 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the council, saying medical aid schemes could not account for personal savings as part of their assets. If successful, Genesis’s appeal could see the savings of members being recorded as assets and open for creditors to access them in the event that the scheme went insolvent. Ge...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as exclusive Financial Times articles, ProfileData financial data, and digital access to the Sunday Times and Sunday Times Daily.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems? Email or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now