US activist investor puts pressure on Britain’s $333bn trust sector
Hedge fund Saba Capital targets seven UK trusts, accusing the 160-year-old sector of widespread underperformance
02 February 2025 - 16:29
bySINEAD CRUISE, Nell Mackenzie and Iain Withers
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Saba Capital Management founder Boaz Weinstein speaks during a conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, US. File photo: RICHARD BRIAN/REUTERS
London — US activist investor Boaz Weinstein may have suffered a defeat in the first vote on his plans to shake up Britain’s investment trust industry, but bosses in the £269-billion ($333bn) sector will not be sleeping easy.
Weinstein’s Saba Capital Management wants to seize control of seven trusts it owns sizeable stakes in, after accusing the 160-year-old sector of widespread underperformance, which the trusts reject.
In an initial salvo, shareholders in Herald Investment Trust, the largest of the seven, voted decisively against Saba’s bid to unseat its board last week.
Next up are Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust and Keystone Positive Change Investment Trust, which hold votes on Monday. Three others follow on Tuesday and Wednesday.
“Boards and managers have to take note as any trust languishing with a liquid portfolio on a wide discount without any discount control mechanism is vulnerable,” said Daniel Lockyer, Hawksmoor Investment Management senior fund manager.
Investment trusts are listed vehicles that individuals can buy shares in to gain exposure to assets, from listed stocks to hard-to-access private companies.
Their shares should trade broadly in line with the net value of their assets (NAVs). But trust shares can fall out of favour, creating big gaps between share prices and NAVs, and leaving investors unable to cash out without leaving value behind.
Win or lose, Saba’s battle looks likely to mean more pressure on trusts to improve their performance.
“Saba’s campaign has already set a powerful precedent,” said Sonia Falconieri, professor of finance at London’s Bayes Business School. “The message is clear: performance and governance will remain under intense scrutiny.”
A Reuters analysis of the seven targeted trusts’ most recent accounts — filed between April and November last year — shows a £350-million total shortfall between the value of the shares at the filing date and the £3.9-billion book value of the assets the trusts held.
While those figures only capture a snapshot in time, the filings show discounts are persistent.
Trusts say they have delivered respectable long-term performance, that trading improved in 2024, and that they are taking action to close discounts. They call Saba’s campaign self-serving.
Weinstein has vowed to fix performance by merging unpopular trusts, buying back shares and investing in more private assets rather than large listed stocks.
In an interview before Herald’s vote, Weinstein, who agreed to a standstill this month in a long-running battle with dozens of BlackRock trusts, told Reuters he was preparing for the long haul.
“If we lose narrowly, we may win in some period not that far thereafter,” he said, adding that at least two institutional investors had handed him fresh cash since his campaign went public late 2024. He declined to name them.
In the meantime, trusts are trying to rally shareholders.
Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust chairperson Jonathan Simpson-Dent accepts discounts have widened. But he said the sector was already focused on fixing it.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
US activist investor puts pressure on Britain’s $333bn trust sector
Hedge fund Saba Capital targets seven UK trusts, accusing the 160-year-old sector of widespread underperformance
London — US activist investor Boaz Weinstein may have suffered a defeat in the first vote on his plans to shake up Britain’s investment trust industry, but bosses in the £269-billion ($333bn) sector will not be sleeping easy.
Weinstein’s Saba Capital Management wants to seize control of seven trusts it owns sizeable stakes in, after accusing the 160-year-old sector of widespread underperformance, which the trusts reject.
In an initial salvo, shareholders in Herald Investment Trust, the largest of the seven, voted decisively against Saba’s bid to unseat its board last week.
Next up are Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust and Keystone Positive Change Investment Trust, which hold votes on Monday. Three others follow on Tuesday and Wednesday.
“Boards and managers have to take note as any trust languishing with a liquid portfolio on a wide discount without any discount control mechanism is vulnerable,” said Daniel Lockyer, Hawksmoor Investment Management senior fund manager.
Investment trusts are listed vehicles that individuals can buy shares in to gain exposure to assets, from listed stocks to hard-to-access private companies.
Their shares should trade broadly in line with the net value of their assets (NAVs). But trust shares can fall out of favour, creating big gaps between share prices and NAVs, and leaving investors unable to cash out without leaving value behind.
Win or lose, Saba’s battle looks likely to mean more pressure on trusts to improve their performance.
“Saba’s campaign has already set a powerful precedent,” said Sonia Falconieri, professor of finance at London’s Bayes Business School. “The message is clear: performance and governance will remain under intense scrutiny.”
A Reuters analysis of the seven targeted trusts’ most recent accounts — filed between April and November last year — shows a £350-million total shortfall between the value of the shares at the filing date and the £3.9-billion book value of the assets the trusts held.
While those figures only capture a snapshot in time, the filings show discounts are persistent.
Trusts say they have delivered respectable long-term performance, that trading improved in 2024, and that they are taking action to close discounts. They call Saba’s campaign self-serving.
Weinstein has vowed to fix performance by merging unpopular trusts, buying back shares and investing in more private assets rather than large listed stocks.
In an interview before Herald’s vote, Weinstein, who agreed to a standstill this month in a long-running battle with dozens of BlackRock trusts, told Reuters he was preparing for the long haul.
“If we lose narrowly, we may win in some period not that far thereafter,” he said, adding that at least two institutional investors had handed him fresh cash since his campaign went public late 2024. He declined to name them.
In the meantime, trusts are trying to rally shareholders.
Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust chairperson Jonathan Simpson-Dent accepts discounts have widened. But he said the sector was already focused on fixing it.
Reuters
Auditors get tougher guidelines on judging firms’ environmental claims
Chinese insurers to invest billions in shares to boost markets
STEPHEN CRANSTON: Fund managers are positioned best to combine asset classes
Generali, BPCE in move to create Europe’s biggest asset manager
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Lender BBVA plans $1bn share buyback as net profit beats forecasts
Abu Dhabi wealth fund, Orion to invest $1.2bn in metals, mining
Chinese insurers to invest billions in shares to boost markets
Commerzbank says UniCredit’s approach is hostile and unilateral
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.