Nine companies refuse to be joined in bank forex trading case
29 November 2021 - 20:24
byERNEST MABUZA
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
All nine banking companies the Competition Commission seeks to join in a complaint about allegedly manipulating the rand-dollar exchange rate have refused to be joined in the case. Picture: 123RF/PHONGPHAN SUPPHAKANKAMJON
No case has been made by the Competition Commission against either Nedbank Group or Nedbank in its complaint against various banks for allegedly colluding to fix prices and divide markets in respect of the rand-dollar exchange rate.
This was the submission made by Anthony Gotz SC, counsel for Nedbank Group Ltd and Nedbank Ltd, in opposing the application by the commission to join the holding company and the bank in its complaint, initially launched in 2015.
At the beginning of the hearings on Monday, counsel for the commission, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, argued that the need to properly spend public funds called for the nine banks accused of manipulating the rand-dollar exchange rate to be joined in a case against 23 other banks that had already been charged by the commission.
Ngcukaitobi said it would also be convenient for all banks facing the same charge to be in the same room to avoid a multiplicity of actions.
However, the nine banks opposed their proposed joinder in the case. They are HSBC Bank USA, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, Bank of America NA, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Nedbank Group Ltd, Nedbank Ltd, FirstRand Ltd, FirstRand Bank Ltd and Standard Americas Inc.
“There is no cause of action made out against either of the respondents. No prima facie case of action is made out against Nedbank Group.
“In the absence of any case that is made out against Nedbank Group, it is justifiable for Nedbank Group to say, ‘What am I doing here?’ It is entitled to object to the joinder on the basis that no case has been made out,” Gotz said.
Gotz said in the case of Nedbank Group Ltd, it was not a bank and was not an authorised foreign exchange dealer.
“By that fact alone it cannot be a participant in the act alleged by the applicants. It does not employ traders. On what basis does the commission say it must be cited as a respondent? Nedbank Group, at the very least, ought not to be joined in these proceedings,” Gotz said.
Likewise, Mark Wesley, advocate for FirstRand Ltd and FirstRand Bank Ltd, also opposed the joinder and said there were no allegations against FirstRand Ltd, a holding company of First Rand Bank Ltd.
Ngcukaitobi will reply to the banking companies when the tribunal resumes on Tuesday morning.
The conduct complained of was allegedly carried out via the exchange of competitively sensitive information on the electronic messaging platforms used for currency trading.
The commission said this enabled the banks to co-ordinate their trading activities when quoting customers who buy or sell currencies.
It said this co-ordination had the effect of eliminating competition among the banks as it enabled them to charge an agreed price for a specific amount of currency.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Nine companies refuse to be joined in bank forex trading case
No case has been made by the Competition Commission against either Nedbank Group or Nedbank in its complaint against various banks for allegedly colluding to fix prices and divide markets in respect of the rand-dollar exchange rate.
This was the submission made by Anthony Gotz SC, counsel for Nedbank Group Ltd and Nedbank Ltd, in opposing the application by the commission to join the holding company and the bank in its complaint, initially launched in 2015.
At the beginning of the hearings on Monday, counsel for the commission, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC, argued that the need to properly spend public funds called for the nine banks accused of manipulating the rand-dollar exchange rate to be joined in a case against 23 other banks that had already been charged by the commission.
Ngcukaitobi said it would also be convenient for all banks facing the same charge to be in the same room to avoid a multiplicity of actions.
However, the nine banks opposed their proposed joinder in the case. They are HSBC Bank USA, Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, Bank of America NA, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Nedbank Group Ltd, Nedbank Ltd, FirstRand Ltd, FirstRand Bank Ltd and Standard Americas Inc.
“There is no cause of action made out against either of the respondents. No prima facie case of action is made out against Nedbank Group.
“In the absence of any case that is made out against Nedbank Group, it is justifiable for Nedbank Group to say, ‘What am I doing here?’ It is entitled to object to the joinder on the basis that no case has been made out,” Gotz said.
Gotz said in the case of Nedbank Group Ltd, it was not a bank and was not an authorised foreign exchange dealer.
“By that fact alone it cannot be a participant in the act alleged by the applicants. It does not employ traders. On what basis does the commission say it must be cited as a respondent? Nedbank Group, at the very least, ought not to be joined in these proceedings,” Gotz said.
Likewise, Mark Wesley, advocate for FirstRand Ltd and FirstRand Bank Ltd, also opposed the joinder and said there were no allegations against FirstRand Ltd, a holding company of First Rand Bank Ltd.
Ngcukaitobi will reply to the banking companies when the tribunal resumes on Tuesday morning.
The conduct complained of was allegedly carried out via the exchange of competitively sensitive information on the electronic messaging platforms used for currency trading.
The commission said this enabled the banks to co-ordinate their trading activities when quoting customers who buy or sell currencies.
It said this co-ordination had the effect of eliminating competition among the banks as it enabled them to charge an agreed price for a specific amount of currency.
TimesLIVE
Antitrust body aims to join nine more banks in forex trading case
POLO LETEKA RADEBE: African Bank can finally realise its founders’ vision
Myanmar crisis gives rise to online forex trading groups
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
SA’s top broker: who offers rand for rand the best services?
Mining, travel and retail stocks push global markets down
India relaxes rules in boost for banks’ lucrative forex trade
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.