Australia’s disgraced Westpac Banking to hear riot act at AGM
The bank is accused of breaching money-laundering laws 23-million times and failing to detect money funneled to child pornographers
Melbourne — Westpac Banking remains under pressure over a money-laundering scandal even after the resignation of its CEO, with powerful shareholder advisers calling for more changes to the board.
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), which has about 2,000 institutional clients globally, is recommending a vote against the re-election of directors Nerida Caesar and Peter Marriott and against the bank’s pay report at Westpac’s AGM on December 12.
A second proxy advisory firm, CGI Glass Lewis, is also recommending Marriott’s departure but stopped short of calling for a vote against the remuneration report and Caesar’s re-election.
“All directors share in the collective accountability for governance and risk failure,” ISS said in its report. It stopped short of backing a motion that could result in the entire board being voted out, but said “ongoing scrutiny” of progress in tackling governance issues is needed.
Australia’s second-largest lender has been engulfed by the scandal since the financial crimes agency alleged last week that it breached money-laundering laws 23-million times and failed to detect the funneling of money to child pornographers in the Philippines.
Under mounting pressure from institutional investors and government ministers, CEO Brian Hartzer resigned on Tuesday, chair Lindsay Maxsted brought forward his retirement, and director Ewen Crouch, who heads the risk committee, said he wouldn’t seek re-election to the board.
While the resignations have eased pressure on the bank, the criticism of the governance failing has not abated. The lawsuit has shone a spotlight yet again on structural problems in an industry that was lambasted earlier in 2019 for a runaway culture of greed and poor behaviour.
Westpac’s shares closed 0.2% lower in Sydney on Wednesday, taking the total decline in market capitalisation since the lawsuit was announced on November 20 to A$6.2bn ($4.2bn).
“We demand very high standards from our financial institutions, and it’s right we demand high standards, and it’s right we expect those standards to be met,” Reserve Bank of Australia governor Philip Lowe said after a speech on Tuesday night. “And when they’re not met there needs to be accountability.”
In a potential sign of the reputational hit the bank has taken, the Australian newspaper reported on Wednesday that Westpac won’t be chosen to take part in the government’s new programme to support lending to first-home buyers. The National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation, which is overseeing the initiative, declined to comment on the report.
The Australian Council of Superannuation Investors, a body that represents 39 funds overseeing a combined A$2.2-trillion, said on Tuesday that it will push for more board renewal next year.
Kim Farrant, a portfolio manager for responsible investments at pension fund VicSuper, said the volume of under-reporting exposed by the lawsuit showed “a material lack of due diligence of both correspondent banks and customers and point to a direct failure by Westpac’s senior management and board.
“We must remember that these are not just financial transactions, that they impact real people,” she said, adding that VicSuper plans to “strongly voice our concerns” at the AGM “via the director re-election resolutions and, if necessary, remuneration report voting”.
Shareholders typically vent their frustration at AGMs by voting against the remuneration report, and the bank suffered a large vote against executive pay last year after a government-appointed inquiry exposed widespread misconduct across the banking industry. Should more than 25% of shareholders vote against the pay report on December 12, that would constitute a so-called second strike — and trigger a motion, which, if passed would force all directors to seek re-election.
ISS is recommending a vote against the pay report, citing a lack of alignment between executive pay and shareholder outcomes. But it isn’t in favour of a motion to oust the board at this stage.
Given Maxsted is retiring and Crouch isn’t seeking re-election, “shareholders may consider that reasonable steps have started for board renewal”, ISS said. “Ongoing scrutiny will be required by shareholders to monitor progress by the board and management, in addressing ongoing governance concerns.”
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.