Proposals contained in a draft bill to change the tax treatment of foreign trusts held by South Africans are aggressive and should be reconsidered, says Andrew Wellsted, director at Norton Rose Fulbright. "The continued attack on trusts by the revenue authority is disappointing because they serve a useful commercial purpose and are not solely used as tax-avoidance structures," Wellsted said this week. Trusts could ring-fence assets owned by entrepreneurs so that creditors could not attach them or protect assets for children not old enough to manage their parents’ estates in the event of death, he said. Revenue authorities globally are scrutinising trusts, which are perceived as tax-avoidance vehicles. The Davis Tax Committee, an advisory panel to the Treasury chaired by Judge Dennis Davis, has proposed that the South African Revenue Service establish an investigations unit to examine foreign discretionary trusts. Johan van Zyl, partner and CEO in SA of international family office St...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.