Why banks are avoiding Sassa contracts
The South African Social Security Agency will have its work cut out finding a replacement if SA's top court declines to approve an extension of the CPS contract
Most of the four largest banks opted not to participate in the South African Social Security Agency’s (Sassa’s) last-ditch attempt to appoint someone to distribute social grants to 17-million recipients after being put off by agency requirements. The new tender was meant to replace incumbent Cash Paymaster Services (CPS), whose contract with Sassa was ruled invalid in the Constitutional Court three years ago. This means the agency will have its work cut out finding a replacement if the court declines to approve an extension of the CPS contract. Sassa issued a "request for information" in December 2016 that closed on January 24. At least two major banks — First National Bank (FNB) and Nedbank — considered the request, which proposed breaking up the agency’s service-level agreement with Net 1 UEPS’s CPS into six agreements. These agreements encompassed producing and distributing beneficiary cards, issuing them, bank account management, "card acquiring", cash distribution through "biom...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.