Shell faces call for break-up as profit disappoints
Third Point Capital hedge fund says splitting oil major into several companies would increase its performance and market value
28 October 2021 - 13:26
by Laura Hurst
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Royal Dutch Shell CEO Ben van Beurden. Picture: REUTERS/SERGEI KARPUKHIN
Royal Dutch Shell responded to external pressure by setting a more ambitious target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions from its operations, while reporting an increase in third-quarter profit that fell short of expectations.
Like its peers, Shell has been lifted by the surge in oil and gas prices, but nevertheless finds itself pulled in many different directions by people unhappy with its plans. Dan Loeb’s Third Point Capital hedge fund is seeking the break-up of the energy giant to increase its performance and market value, a move that would thwart its plan to keep pumping oil and gas as it embraces renewable energy. A Dutch court has also ordered the company to cut carbon emissions much faster than it had previously planned.
“This quarter we’ve generated record cash flow, maintained capital discipline and announced our intention to distribute $7bn to our shareholders,” CEO Ben van Beurden said in a statement on Thursday. Combined with the more ambitious emissions target, “this is clear evidence of how we are accelerating our Powering Progress strategy, purposefully and profitably”.
https://www.youtube.com/user/BusinessDayLive
Shell’s third-quarter adjusted net income was $4.13bn, up from $955m a year earlier but well below the average analyst estimate of $5.42bn.
The company set an absolute carbon-reduction target of 50% by 2030, compared with 2016 levels on a net basis. The new goal covers Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, which are directly under Shell’s operational control, but not the Scope 3 emissions of its customers.
Critics have criticised carbon-intensity targets — a measure of the carbon released per unit of energy generated — because they can allow companies to increase absolute emissions even as they hit their own environmental targets.
Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Shell faces call for break-up as profit disappoints
Third Point Capital hedge fund says splitting oil major into several companies would increase its performance and market value
Royal Dutch Shell responded to external pressure by setting a more ambitious target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions from its operations, while reporting an increase in third-quarter profit that fell short of expectations.
Like its peers, Shell has been lifted by the surge in oil and gas prices, but nevertheless finds itself pulled in many different directions by people unhappy with its plans. Dan Loeb’s Third Point Capital hedge fund is seeking the break-up of the energy giant to increase its performance and market value, a move that would thwart its plan to keep pumping oil and gas as it embraces renewable energy. A Dutch court has also ordered the company to cut carbon emissions much faster than it had previously planned.
“This quarter we’ve generated record cash flow, maintained capital discipline and announced our intention to distribute $7bn to our shareholders,” CEO Ben van Beurden said in a statement on Thursday. Combined with the more ambitious emissions target, “this is clear evidence of how we are accelerating our Powering Progress strategy, purposefully and profitably”.
https://www.youtube.com/user/BusinessDayLive
Shell’s third-quarter adjusted net income was $4.13bn, up from $955m a year earlier but well below the average analyst estimate of $5.42bn.
The company set an absolute carbon-reduction target of 50% by 2030, compared with 2016 levels on a net basis. The new goal covers Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, which are directly under Shell’s operational control, but not the Scope 3 emissions of its customers.
Critics have criticised carbon-intensity targets — a measure of the carbon released per unit of energy generated — because they can allow companies to increase absolute emissions even as they hit their own environmental targets.
Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Saudi Aramco pledges net-zero emissions by 2050
Vivo multiplies retail fuel rollout
COP26 spotlight will be on Britain’s fossil fuel dilemma
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
SA’s petroleum industry warns refinery fleet could become obsolete
Greenpeace demonstrates at Shell refinery in Rotterdam port
Chevron vows to cultivate net zero ambition
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.