Media companies to ask court to lift ban on sports service
Disney, Fox and Warner Bros argue lower court’s decision denies consumers access to lower-cost service
06 January 2025 - 14:43
byDawn Chmielewski
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Los Angeles — Three major media companies will ask the US Court of Appeals on Monday to reverse a ruling that blocked the launch of their Venu Sports streaming service, arguing that a district court judge was wrong to halt its planned debut on antitrust grounds.
Walt Disney, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery argue that the lower court’s decision denies consumers access to a new, lower-cost service designed to appeal to price-conscious sports fans who have dropped out of the traditional TV ecosystem or never subscribed in the first place.
Rival sports streaming service FuboTV sued the big media companies last February, saying Venu Sports would violate US antitrust law by reducing competition and driving up prices. A district court judge found that Fubo is likely to succeed in its antitrust claims, and issued the injunction temporarily barring Venu’s launch.
“The district court’s injunction forecloses competitive entry, decreases consumer choice and denies consumers lower prices — all with the effect of shielding Fubo from competition,” the media companies argued in a December 9 court filing. “The decision should be reversed.” At issue is a practice known as bundling, in which the media companies require distributors like Fubo to carry a package of programming, including less desirable channels, to gain access to valuable live sports.
Fubo said “forced bundling” prevented it from offering a sports-centric service — an exception the media companies made for their own joint-venture, Venu Sports.
The justice department, New York, Illinois, California and other states urged the second US Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the preliminary injunction. In its supporting brief, the justice department cited the district court’s findings that restrictions on competition among the joint-venture partners would effectively prevent other sports-only services from emerging. That would grant the media companies — who collectively controlled about 54% of US sports rights — dominance in distributing sports-focused TV packages to consumers, the justice department wrote.
“The district court found that [the media companies] were less likely, after forming Venu, to unbundle that content for other distributors like Fubo wishing to create their own sports-centric offerings,” the justice department wrote. “This foreclosure would harm competition in the live pay TV market.”
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Media companies to ask court to lift ban on sports service
Disney, Fox and Warner Bros argue lower court’s decision denies consumers access to lower-cost service
Los Angeles — Three major media companies will ask the US Court of Appeals on Monday to reverse a ruling that blocked the launch of their Venu Sports streaming service, arguing that a district court judge was wrong to halt its planned debut on antitrust grounds.
Walt Disney, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery argue that the lower court’s decision denies consumers access to a new, lower-cost service designed to appeal to price-conscious sports fans who have dropped out of the traditional TV ecosystem or never subscribed in the first place.
Rival sports streaming service FuboTV sued the big media companies last February, saying Venu Sports would violate US antitrust law by reducing competition and driving up prices. A district court judge found that Fubo is likely to succeed in its antitrust claims, and issued the injunction temporarily barring Venu’s launch.
“The district court’s injunction forecloses competitive entry, decreases consumer choice and denies consumers lower prices — all with the effect of shielding Fubo from competition,” the media companies argued in a December 9 court filing. “The decision should be reversed.” At issue is a practice known as bundling, in which the media companies require distributors like Fubo to carry a package of programming, including less desirable channels, to gain access to valuable live sports.
Fubo said “forced bundling” prevented it from offering a sports-centric service — an exception the media companies made for their own joint-venture, Venu Sports.
The justice department, New York, Illinois, California and other states urged the second US Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the preliminary injunction. In its supporting brief, the justice department cited the district court’s findings that restrictions on competition among the joint-venture partners would effectively prevent other sports-only services from emerging. That would grant the media companies — who collectively controlled about 54% of US sports rights — dominance in distributing sports-focused TV packages to consumers, the justice department wrote.
“The district court found that [the media companies] were less likely, after forming Venu, to unbundle that content for other distributors like Fubo wishing to create their own sports-centric offerings,” the justice department wrote. “This foreclosure would harm competition in the live pay TV market.”
Reuters
Disney surges on robust multiyear forecast
What Trump’s win means for Hollywood
CNN rolls out digital paywall for first time
Hollywood and AI — a romcom in the making
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Disney admits nothing but pays anyway
Walt Disney pays out $43m to settle pay discrimination suit
Judge puts sports streaming venture from Disney, Fox and Warner on ice
Disney surges on robust multiyear forecast
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.