Judge in Kenya rules Meta not in contempt of court
The case revolved around the nonpayment of 184 content moderators after they were laid off by a contractor to Facebook
07 December 2023 - 16:17
byReuters
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Nairobi — A Kenyan judge on Thursday found Facebook’s parent company Meta was not in contempt of court for failing to pay dozens of content moderators that a contractor laid off.
Labour judge Mathews Nduma Nderi said Meta did not “deliberately and contemptuously” breach a court order requiring it to pay the wages of hundreds of Facebook content moderators.
“They did various things which they thought were lawful in trying to deal with their situation, but we did not find that what they did amounted to contempt,” Nderi said.
Earlier this year, 184 moderators sued Meta and two contractors after they said they lost their jobs with one of the firms, Sama, for organising a union.
The plaintiffs alleged they were then blacklisted from applying for the same roles at the second firm, Majorel, after Facebook changed contractors. Out-of-court settlement talks collapsed in October.
A Meta spokesperson declined to comment. Sama and Majorel did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.
Meta has previously responded to allegations of a poor working environment in Kenya by saying it requires partners to provide industry-leading conditions.
Sama has said it has always followed Kenyan law and provided mental health services to its employees. Majorel has said it does not comment on pending or active litigation.
Nderi accepted a request by the plaintiffs’ lawyer Merci Mutemi to be given 45 days to amend the contempt of court petition, and said that unless the matter was resolved out of court, the case would be given priority for the court to determine its merits.
British tech rights group Foxglove, which is supporting the plaintiffs, said it was eager to bring the case to trial.
“We remain confident of our case overall, as we have prevailed on every substantive point so far,” Foxglove director Martha Dark said in a statement.
“The most important ruling remains the one we won in June: Meta can no longer hide behind outsources to excuse the exploitation and abuse of its content moderators.”
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Judge in Kenya rules Meta not in contempt of court
The case revolved around the nonpayment of 184 content moderators after they were laid off by a contractor to Facebook
Nairobi — A Kenyan judge on Thursday found Facebook’s parent company Meta was not in contempt of court for failing to pay dozens of content moderators that a contractor laid off.
Labour judge Mathews Nduma Nderi said Meta did not “deliberately and contemptuously” breach a court order requiring it to pay the wages of hundreds of Facebook content moderators.
“They did various things which they thought were lawful in trying to deal with their situation, but we did not find that what they did amounted to contempt,” Nderi said.
Earlier this year, 184 moderators sued Meta and two contractors after they said they lost their jobs with one of the firms, Sama, for organising a union.
The plaintiffs alleged they were then blacklisted from applying for the same roles at the second firm, Majorel, after Facebook changed contractors. Out-of-court settlement talks collapsed in October.
A Meta spokesperson declined to comment. Sama and Majorel did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.
Meta has previously responded to allegations of a poor working environment in Kenya by saying it requires partners to provide industry-leading conditions.
Sama has said it has always followed Kenyan law and provided mental health services to its employees. Majorel has said it does not comment on pending or active litigation.
Nderi accepted a request by the plaintiffs’ lawyer Merci Mutemi to be given 45 days to amend the contempt of court petition, and said that unless the matter was resolved out of court, the case would be given priority for the court to determine its merits.
British tech rights group Foxglove, which is supporting the plaintiffs, said it was eager to bring the case to trial.
“We remain confident of our case overall, as we have prevailed on every substantive point so far,” Foxglove director Martha Dark said in a statement.
“The most important ruling remains the one we won in June: Meta can no longer hide behind outsources to excuse the exploitation and abuse of its content moderators.”
Reuters
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.