Market data including bonds and fuel prices
Wednesday, August 10 2022
President laments that scarcely a day passes without reports about men attacking, violating and killing women
Chair Siboniso Duma says province may well support Ramaphosa for a second term
Antitrust suit would be the US justice department’s second case against Google
The Trump-era tariffs on imported metals have been eased for some other countries
In the wake of SAA’s near-demise Comair’s market share crept up to 35%-40% by the time it too collapsed
Ahmad Abouammo was found guilty of turning over personal information of platform users who’d criticised the Saudi royal family
Failure to win on Saturday would put coach Ian Foster and captain under pressure in terms of their future with the team
Europe has become far less welcoming to Russian oligarchs and others who seek to buy their way in
Much has been said about how the pandemic is motivating Americans to be more discerning about what they put in their bodies. But the crisis may also be having a big effect on what they put on their bodies.
The concept of so-called clean beauty — makeup and skincare products marketed as free of harmful, artificial ingredients — is the latest catchphrase in a burgeoning world of products sold as sustainable, environmentally conscious or simply safer.
Demand has spiked over the past year. According to a July report by The NPD Group, about 68% of consumers say they are looking for skincare brands that highlight “clean” ingredients.
“Consumers are more knowledgeable than ever about what they’re putting into their bodies and onto their skin, and there’s a desire to make healthy and environmentally conscious decisions,” said New York-based dermatologist Joshua Zeichner.
But while the US Food and Drug Administration regulates cosmetics to make sure they are not adulterated or misbranded, the agency is not tasked with approving most of these products before they hit the shelves. And though the phrase is often associated with naturally derived ingredients, there is no standard definition for “clean” beauty. In many cases, purveyors focus on what is not included, as well as on environmentally friendly formulations and packaging, according to NielsenIQ.
The fuzzy definition of “clean beauty” has not stopped skincare giants from climbing aboard. In the first half of the year, sales at department and beauty stores of products perceived as “clean” climbed by about 33% to $1.6bn from the same period last year, according to NPD. Skincare and makeup alone experienced volume growth of more than 20% each.
Major retailers such as Sephora and Ulta Beauty designate as “clean” everything from face cleansers to eyeshadow if they omit ingredients known or suspected to harm humans or the environment, the companies said. Formulations that are vegan or don’t involve animal testing are also candidates for inclusion, and environmentally friendly packaging also comes into play, according to Ulta chief merchandising officer Monica Arnaudo.
At Sephora, such clean products range from lip gloss to foundation, sold under its own and third-party brands. “The landscape can be challenging, due to the vast number of terms or claims — natural, green, organic and so on,” Sephora vice-president of skincare merchandising Cindy Deily said.
Consumers should also know natural does not automatically mean better or safer, said Zeichner, the dermatologist. Ingredients such as essential oils can trigger allergic reactions, especially for those with sensitive skin. Moreover, most beauty products require preservatives to avoid microbial contamination, making formulations without any artificial ingredients hard to come by.
“The only all-natural skincare treatments would be the equivalent of smashing up an avocado and putting it directly on your face as a mask,” Zeichner said.
As far as what is excluded, many of these products tout a lack of phthalates, which can be found in nail polish, hairspray and plastic packaging, and parabens, which are used as a preservative. The EU has taken a more aggressive stance on some of these chemicals, while the FDA is still evaluating whether they are actually harmful to humans.
Meanwhile, more than half of beauty and personal care products sold in the US are already paraben free, according to NielsenIQ. Still, the “free from” category is driving growth, the research firm said.
While the ingredients aspect of clean beauty may be nebulous, the packaging part is a little more black-and-white. Personal care product consumers are increasingly focused on sustainability across production and disposal, according to NielsenIQ senior vice-president of customer development Tara James Taylor.
“It’s not just about the ingredients any more, but about what is better for society,” James Taylor said. “We see accelerating sales growth for products that are ‘better for we’, which include a positive environmental impact.”
NPD beauty industry adviser Larissa Jensen sees the next frontier involving “cleanical” brands, or those that build their lines around laboratory-tested benefits and ingredients while promising “clean, safe, synthetics”.
Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Would you like to comment on this article? Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.