Why a female fund manager is opposed to gender quotas
Suitably qualified and experienced candidates in the tech world are just too hard to find — itself indicative of ongoing gender bias
24 February 2021 - 12:28
byKat Van Hoof
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
London — For fund manager Katie Potts, setting mandatory quotas for women on corporate boards of technology start-ups is a bad idea. Not because she’s against diversity, but because she says there just aren’t enough suitable candidates.
“There are simply not enough experienced women in the sector and of suitable calibre to fill a third of board posts” in the smaller tech company space, the founder of UK-based Herald Investment Trust said in the company’s annual financial report on Tuesday. Many start-ups also struggle to compete for talent against bigger companies such as Alphabet, Apple and Facebook, she said.
Small software and tech companies make up a bulk of Herald’s holdings, and her funds will be “pragmatic” when voting on mandatory quotas and “overly burdensome” regulations, Potts said, citing “instances of unsuitable candidates being appointed and doing real damage”.
Potts’s comments put her at odds with the growing push for more gender and racial diversity in corporate suites, with such metrics drawing greater scrutiny from regulators and investors alike. Last week, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the world’s biggest, urged companies it invests in with boards where either gender has less than 30% representation to set targets to address the issue.
In an interview, Potts elaborated on the challenges faced by smaller companies in complying with some of the gender-equality requirements.
“It’s a nuanced issue in which we want the most suitable candidate to fill the position,” she said. “In this case, especially for smaller companies already battling bigger companies for the best candidates, it’s not easy to find good non-execs.”
Board positions also tend to be taken up by people towards the end of their careers, most of whom are men, Potts said, adding that this may shift in the next generation.
Compliance time
For Potts, increased regulation on such fronts has meant companies spend more time demonstrating compliance, which she and the fund managers at her firm find frustrating. Herald prefers to work on a case-by-case basis with the management at companies it invests in on environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns rather than a practice she characterised as “box ticking”.
Investment strategies adhering to ESG criteria have boomed over the past year. Demand for climate-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is at a record high and accelerating thanks to favourable policies, with global inflows tripling to $89bn in 2020, according to a Bloomberg Intelligence report by analyst Shaheen Contractor.
Potts acknowledged the increasing pressure on companies to comply with ESG metrics. Momentum has picked up with movements such as the Extinction Rebellion, which began in the UK in 2018 and staged protests against environmental degradation and the threat it poses to social collapse.
“I recognise the aims of the Extinction Rebellion demonstrators sleeping in the street in which I live, but I arrogantly believe that we at Herald have done and will do far more to help alleviate global warming through appropriate investment of primary capital in emerging technologies,” Potts said in the annual report.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Why a female fund manager is opposed to gender quotas
Suitably qualified and experienced candidates in the tech world are just too hard to find — itself indicative of ongoing gender bias
London — For fund manager Katie Potts, setting mandatory quotas for women on corporate boards of technology start-ups is a bad idea. Not because she’s against diversity, but because she says there just aren’t enough suitable candidates.
“There are simply not enough experienced women in the sector and of suitable calibre to fill a third of board posts” in the smaller tech company space, the founder of UK-based Herald Investment Trust said in the company’s annual financial report on Tuesday. Many start-ups also struggle to compete for talent against bigger companies such as Alphabet, Apple and Facebook, she said.
Small software and tech companies make up a bulk of Herald’s holdings, and her funds will be “pragmatic” when voting on mandatory quotas and “overly burdensome” regulations, Potts said, citing “instances of unsuitable candidates being appointed and doing real damage”.
Potts’s comments put her at odds with the growing push for more gender and racial diversity in corporate suites, with such metrics drawing greater scrutiny from regulators and investors alike. Last week, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the world’s biggest, urged companies it invests in with boards where either gender has less than 30% representation to set targets to address the issue.
In an interview, Potts elaborated on the challenges faced by smaller companies in complying with some of the gender-equality requirements.
“It’s a nuanced issue in which we want the most suitable candidate to fill the position,” she said. “In this case, especially for smaller companies already battling bigger companies for the best candidates, it’s not easy to find good non-execs.”
Board positions also tend to be taken up by people towards the end of their careers, most of whom are men, Potts said, adding that this may shift in the next generation.
Compliance time
For Potts, increased regulation on such fronts has meant companies spend more time demonstrating compliance, which she and the fund managers at her firm find frustrating. Herald prefers to work on a case-by-case basis with the management at companies it invests in on environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns rather than a practice she characterised as “box ticking”.
Investment strategies adhering to ESG criteria have boomed over the past year. Demand for climate-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is at a record high and accelerating thanks to favourable policies, with global inflows tripling to $89bn in 2020, according to a Bloomberg Intelligence report by analyst Shaheen Contractor.
Potts acknowledged the increasing pressure on companies to comply with ESG metrics. Momentum has picked up with movements such as the Extinction Rebellion, which began in the UK in 2018 and staged protests against environmental degradation and the threat it poses to social collapse.
“I recognise the aims of the Extinction Rebellion demonstrators sleeping in the street in which I live, but I arrogantly believe that we at Herald have done and will do far more to help alleviate global warming through appropriate investment of primary capital in emerging technologies,” Potts said in the annual report.
Bloomberg
ALLAN SECCOMBE: Mining the green sentiment cannot be smoke and mirrors
This is why critique of ESG investing does not wash
Norway wealth fund to squeeze boards over gender diversity
Despite progress, top women still suffer from US pay gap, study shows
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
GRAY MAGUIRE: JSE owes it to investors to step up ESG risk report
JON DUNCAN: Stewardship rivals ESG integration in responsible investment
Low female representation blights mining despite progress in some sectors
African Bank’s glass ceiling has shattered its public image
A mere 100 years later, two German banks appoint their first women to the board
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.