The US women’s national soccer team before the game against Japan in the 2020 She Believes Cup soccer series at Toyota Stadium in Frisco, the US, on March 11 2020. Picture: USA TODAY SPORTS/JEROME MIRON
The US women’s national soccer team before the game against Japan in the 2020 She Believes Cup soccer series at Toyota Stadium in Frisco, the US, on March 11 2020. Picture: USA TODAY SPORTS/JEROME MIRON

Los Angeles — Coca-Cola criticised US Soccer after the federation claimed in court documents that playing for the men’s national team carried more responsibility and required a higher level of skill than that demanded of women players.

The federation made the argument in papers filed this week in the gender discrimination lawsuit filed by the US women's national team against the federation in March of 2019.

“We are extremely disappointed with the unacceptable and offensive comments made by US Soccer,” the Coca-Cola Company said in a statement on Wednesday.

“We have asked to meet them immediately to express our concerns.

“The Coca-Cola Company is firm in its commitment to gender equality, fairness and women's empowerment in the US and around the world and we expect the same from our partners,” added the company, which is a long-established corporate partner of both the US Soccer Federation and Fifa, football's global governing body and organiser of the men's and women's World Cups.

The women players’ lawsuit accuses the federation of gender discrimination and demands $66m in back pay under the Equal Pay act and the Civil Rights Act.

Both sides have requested a summary judgment seeking a ruling in their favour before the May 5 trial date.

In its submission filed this week, the US Soccer Federation argued that the hostile environments in which the men's team play are “unmatched by anything the women's national team (WNT) must face ...”

The federation also argued that “The job of [a men's national team] player (competing against senior men's national teams) requires a higher level of skill based on speed and strength than does the job of [women's national team] player [competing against senior women's national teams].”

Molly Levinson, spokesperson for the players pursuing the lawsuit, called it a “ridiculous argument”.

“It sounds as if it has been made by a caveman,” Levinson said. “Literally everyone in the world understands that an argument that male players 'have more responsibility' is just plain simple sexism and illustrates the very gender discrimination that caused us to file this lawsuit to begin with.

“So looking forward to trial on May 5,” Levinson concluded.

AFP

Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.