Aramco bumper bonds sale is already not living up to the hype
The oil giant is inextricably linked to Saudi Arabia, and that’s a problem, even for Moody’s
Dubai/London — The slump in Aramco bonds since its unprecedented debt sale this month makes one thing clear: you can’t take the Saudi out of Saudi Aramco.
Demand was so great, with bids topping $100bn, that the energy giant managed to raise $12bn at lower yields than the kingdom itself, which is uncommon in corporate bond markets. Investors are now paying the price for that discrepancy: all five maturities have fallen since trading started last week, in some cases by more than 2c on the dollar.
“We view the company as more of a Saudi risk rather than just an energy company,” said Patrick Wacker, a fund manager at Singapore-based UOB Asset Management, who dumped his holdings on the first day of trading to profit from the initial euphoria. He predicts the debt will keep falling until it trades at a yield premium to the Saudi government.
If he’s right, there’s still a ways to go before the Aramco bond sell-off is over. The company’s $3bn worth of notes due in 2029 yielded 3.77% as of 11.12am London time, less than the 3.87% on similar-maturity Saudi government debt sold in January.
Given the order size at the sale, many investors expected the world’s biggest oil producer, known officially as Saudi Arabian Oil Company, would get away with lower yields than the government and instead be compared with global peers such as London-based BP, whose notes due in 2028 yielded 3.45%.
That’s not an unreasonable assumption. With $111.1bn of net income in 2018, Aramco ranks as the most profitable company in the world. Even Moody’s Investors Service said this month it’s a contender for its top Aaa rating, yet “close inter-linkage” with the sovereign prompted it to grade Aramco in line with the Saudi government, which is ranked four steps lower at A1.
“If it weren’t for its post-code it would most likely have come even tighter,” Anders Faergemann, a fund manager in London at PineBridge Investments, which oversees about $90bn and owns Aramco bonds, said of the pricing. “Aramco is a bit of special case as it stirred interest from all types of investors, not just your usual emerging-market investors.”
Aramco is integral to the economy of Saudi Arabia, which has been ramping up debt sales in recent years as falling oil prices left it with budget deficits. The oil industry accounted for more than 60% of the kingdom’s revenue in 2017 and about half of Aramco’s board is comprised of government officials. The money raised is also being used to finance Saudi Arabia’s economic agenda after the state postponed, until at least 2021, plans to sell a stake in Aramco in an initial public offering (IPO).
Some investors that spoke to Bloomberg said a number of bond holders trimmed their positions because they had inflated the size of their initial orders to ensure they’d get a slice of the IPO. Others sold because their allocations were too small to make a difference to their portfolios, they said.
The 2039 notes were trading at 96.92c on the dollar on Thursday, compared with an issue price of 99.161c.
“We did not participate in the new deal as they priced inside the sovereign,’ said Wouter van Overfelt, a Zurich-based senior money manager at Vontobel Asset Management. ‘While there may be good reasons for this to be the case, we would generally prefer the sovereign in such cases.”
Still, investors such as PineBridge in London and TCW Group in Los Angeles say they are staying put, expecting volatility will eventually ease. The bonds were particularly vulnerable to the recent sell-off in US treasuries, but the long-term fundamentals of the company make it worth the risk, they say. The securities were little changed on Thursday.
“Aramco’s new bonds seem to be a victim of the roadshow’s success,” said Brett Rowley, TCW’s MD for emerging markets. “Our view on Aramco’s debt remains constructive. It’s a world-class oil producer, which trades wide to international peers.”
Even so, Wacker at UOB Asset Management, which oversees about $24bn, said the price drop could leave a bitter taste with investors given all the initial hype. “This may not have been the best way to start a capital-markets relationship with bond investors.” he said.