Facebook ordered to curb its data gathering activities in Germany
The world’s largest social media network says it will appeal against the Federal Cartel Office’s edict
Bonn — Facebook has been ordered to curb its data collection practices in Germany after a ruling that the world’s largest social network abused its market dominance to gather information about users without their knowledge or consent.
Facebook said it would appeal the landmark ruling on Thursday by the Federal Cartel Office, the culmination of a three-year probe, saying the antitrust watchdog underestimated the competition it faced and undermined Europe-wide privacy rules that took effect in 2018.
“In future, Facebook will no longer be allowed to force its users to agree to the practically unrestricted collection and assigning of non-Facebook data to their Facebook accounts,” Cartel Office chief Andreas Mundt said.
The findings follow fierce global scrutiny of Facebook over a series of privacy lapses, including the leak of data on tens of millions of Facebook users, as well as the extensive use of targeted ads by foreign powers seeking to influence elections in the US.
These have gone down badly with Germans, reflecting broader concerns over personal surveillance that dates back to Germany’s history of Nazi and Communist rule in the 20th century.
Abuse of power
“Users are often unaware of this flow of data and cannot prevent it if they want to use the services,” justice minister Katarina Barley said, welcoming the ruling. “We need to be rigorous in tackling the abuse of power that comes with data.”
The cartel office objected in particular to how Facebook pools data on people from third-party apps — including its own WhatsApp and Instagram services — and its online tracking of people who aren’t even members.
That includes tracking visitors to websites with an embedded Facebook “like” or share button — and pages where it observes people even though there is no obvious sign the social network is present.
The ruling does not yet have legal force and Facebook has a month to appeal, which the social network said it would do.
“We disagree with their conclusions and intend to appeal so that people in Germany continue to benefit fully from all our services,” Facebook said in a blog post.
“The Bundeskartellamt underestimates the fierce competition we face in Germany, misinterprets our compliance with the GDPR, and threatens the mechanism European law provides for ensuring consistent data protection standards across the EU.”
In its order, the Cartel Office said it would only be possible to assign data from WhatsApp or Instagram to Facebook subject to the voluntary consent of users.
Collecting data from third-party websites and assigning it to Facebook would only be allowed if users give their voluntary consent.
If consent is withheld, Facebook would have to substantially restrict its collection and combining of data, and should develop proposals to do this within 12 months, subject to the outcome of appeal proceedings.
If Facebook fails to comply, the Cartel Office could impose fines of up to 10% of annual global revenues, which grew by 37% to $55.8bn in 2018.
Facebook, responding, said the Cartel Office failed to recognise that it competes with other online services, such as video app YouTube or Twitter, the short-messaging service, for people’s attention.
It also faults the antitrust body for encroaching in areas properly dealt with by data protection regulators under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a broad privacy regime that entered force last May.
“We support the GDPR and take our obligations seriously. Yet the Bundeskartellamt’s decision misapplies German competition law to set different rules that apply to only one company,” Facebook said.
As part of complying with the GDPR, Facebook said it had rebuilt the information it provides people about their privacy and the controls they have over their information, and improved the privacy “choices” that they are offered. It would also soon launch a “clear history” feature.
Mundt said the Cartel Office’s view was that the lack of any alternative to Facebook and the unequal relationship between it and consumers over the handling of their data qualified as antitrust issues — a view that has been upheld in the German Federal Court.
He also expressed concern over reports that Facebook, which counts 2.7-billion users worldwide, plans to merge the infrastructure of its Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram services.
Facebook has said that discussions on such a move are at a very early stage.