Facebook making major changes to shift from news back to friends and family
San Francisco/Bengaluru — Facebook said it’s making major changes to its flagship social network, shifting users’ news feeds back toward posts from friends and family and away from businesses and media outlets — a transition that is likely to mean people spend less time on the site.
In a post on Thursday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said community feedback has shown that public content has been "crowding out the personal moments that lead us to connect more with each other".
The goal of the product teams will be to help Facebook’s more than 2-billion monthly users find content that will lead to more meaningful social interactions, he said.
"By making these changes, I expect the time people spend on Facebook and some measures of engagement will go down," Zuckerberg wrote. "But I also expect the time you do spend on Facebook will be more valuable. And if we do the right thing, I believe that will be good for our community and our business over the long term too."
Last week, Zuckerberg said his resolution for 2018 was to "fix" the social network he co-founded. His vow followed a year that saw Facebook come under sharp criticism for contributing to a climate of extreme political polarisation, the distribution of fake news, and escalating privacy concerns. Last year, lawmakers berated Facebook, Alphabet’s Google and Twitter for failing to prevent Russian manipulation on their platforms during the 2016 US presidential election.
"This is recognition of the issues they’ve faced with toxic content," said Brian Wieser, an analyst at Pivotal Research Group. "People are frustrated with the Russia revelations and fake news and have taken it into their own hands and stopped engaging."
The California-based company has kept revenue growing by consistently selling more advertising in its news feed, striking partnerships with media companies to distribute their stories, and including more video postings, which draw higher ad rates. Facebook’s latest changes don’t impact ads — only business and media-oriented content posted by pages and other people, according to a person familiar with the matter.
In a note earlier this week, Wieser reported Nielsen data showing that in September — the most recent month for which this data is available — core Facebook consumption failed to grow year-over-year for a second consecutive month.
This is recognition of the issues they’ve faced with toxic content. People are frustrated with the Russia revelations and fake news.
"Facebook is already experiencing declines in consumption and the company is responding with these changes today," Wieser said. "Good on Facebook — they are doing the right thing, long term. It may not be good for the business in the short term."
Shares of Facebook fell 4% on Friday after Zuckerberg announced the changes. If the pre-market declines in shares hold, Facebook stands to lose nearly $23bn from its market capitalisation on Friday as a result of the move. Pivotal Research Group said its analysis of Nielsen’s digital consumption rates showed that usage was already falling prior to Zuckerberg’s announcement, although from very high levels.
John Ridding, the CEO of the Financial Times, warned on Friday that the domination of online advertising revenue by search and social media platforms was putting pressure on media firms.
"The FT welcomes moves to recognise and support trusted and reliable news and analysis. But a sustainable solution to the challenges of the new information ecosystem requires further measures," he said. "In particular, a viable subscription model on platforms that enables publishers to build a direct relationship with readers and to manage the terms of access to their content."
The rise and rise of Facebook
Facebook’s popularity and user growth have skyrocketed since its founding in 2004, when it was a sort of online scrapbook and bulletin board for college students. In the company’s early years, the news feed was a scrolling update about the personal activities of friends and family members.
With the latest change, Facebook’s algorithm will prioritise posts that spark back-and-forth discussion or inspire people to share and react.
Months before the company went public in 2012, Facebook started featuring "sponsored story" ads in users’ feeds, and it rolled out mobile advertising that same year. Since then, annual sales have soared from $5.1bn to an estimated $40.2bn last year — and the news feed has become increasingly crowded with advertisements and posts from brands and publications.
The changes promised today aren’t entirely new: Facebook has been shifting the content on its news feed towards posts from friends and family and away from brands and publications for more than a year. With the latest change, Facebook’s algorithm will prioritise posts that spark back-and-forth discussion or inspire people to share and react. This means posts like a friend asking for advice, recommendations for a trip or an article that prompts interaction, according to a post by Facebook’s head of news feed, Adam Mosseri.
A large part of brands and media companies’ strategies is to post articles and videos from their pages to engage consumers — items that aren’t considered "meaningful interactions" between people. Downplaying those posts from brands and businesses may put revenue at risk, said James Cakmak, an analyst at Monness Crespi Hardt.
"There will be less opportunity to expose Facebook users to brands," Cakmak said. "But those opportunities to get in front of users will be that much more impactful if it’s more selective."
Though the shift back to personal interaction may not mean fewer paid marketing spots in users’ feeds, any drop in engagement and attention may still translate to fewer ad dollars. Travis Parker Martin is the co-founder of Bootkik, a Calgary-based start-up that attributes the majority of its growth to its Facebook presence. More than 90% of the education start-up’s marketing budget has been spent on Facebook ads. Given Thursday’s announcement, Martin said he plans to significantly decrease that.
"Only a few weeks ago, we decided we might be better served growing our presence on YouTube. We were frustrated that the returns were diminishing on Facebook." Martin said. "This confirms that we will have to pursue other channels."
Bloomberg and Reuters