INEQUALITY PROPAGANDA
LEON LOUW: Definitions lose all meaning when in the service of dogma
'Why are such vacuous slogans as 'white monopoly capital' and 'radical economic transformation' taken seriously?'
Why are coherent definitions and ideology incompatible? Why are such vacuous slogans as "white monopoly capital" (WMC) and "radical economic transformation" taken seriously? Do such commonplace terms as "right wing", "left wing", "capitalism", "socialism", "fascism", "neoliberal" and "communism" have coherent meanings? Sloppy language has profound consequences. To legitimise the fascist ICT White Paper, for instance, telecoms minister Siyabonga Cwele denies that the transfer of private telecommunications assets to a single state-controlled monopoly is "expropriation" or "nationalisation".When the chattering classes say whites own, and they want to "redistribute", a stated percentage of land, they never say if they mean land by area (least important), number of properties, usage or value (most important), or if they want redistribution to government or black owners. Although the world’s new ideological frontier is "inequality", no-one defines the term coherently. Oxfam’s headline-gra...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.