We live in a rapidly evolving, hyperconnected world, where goods, capital and people are more mobile than ever. But whereas countries have shown a willingness to co-operate on exchanging goods and capital, the international community has shown little appetite for improving how it governs human mobility. After the wide-scale persecution and displacement of people in the Second World War, world leaders took the bold step of crafting the 1951 Refugee Convention. In doing so, they relinquished a measure of national sovereignty — by accepting the principle of non-refoulement — to promote global solidarity towards refugees. On the other hand, country leaders saw migration as something temporary that could be managed ad hoc, through unilateral or bilateral agreements primarily designed to fill specific labour market needs in developed economies. In hindsight, it is now clear that this approach was inadequate for dealing with the upsurge in human mobility that came with global and regional ...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.